Titlebook: Aquinas after Frege; Giovanni Ventimiglia Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer N

CT951

書目名稱Aquinas after Frege影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Aquinas after Frege影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Aquinas after Frege網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Aquinas after Frege網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Aquinas after Frege被引頻次




書目名稱Aquinas after Frege被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Aquinas after Frege年度引用




書目名稱Aquinas after Frege年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Aquinas after Frege讀者反饋




書目名稱Aquinas after Frege讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

恫嚇

can be better understood though Frege’s distinction between.This book provides a fresh reading of Aquinas’ metaphysics in the light of insights from the works of Frege. In particular, Ventimiglia argues that Aquinas’ doctrine of being can be better understood through Frege’s distinction between the

推延

口音在加重

Being,ncerns the relation between the two sub-senses of the present actuality sense, namely the “is” as predicate (.) and the “is” as copula (.)..The third question concerns the relation between the two fundamental senses of being—the “there is” and the “present actuality sense”—in the light of Frege’s distinctions between the senses of unit.

我還要背著他

The Senses of Being in Context,ing the fifth book of Aristotle’s ., where the philosopher had dealt with this important topic, mentioning four senses of being. In this chapter, the textual source of Thomas’s theory of the two senses of being, namely some texts by Averroes, is identified, and its historical path reconstructed.

使成波狀

堅(jiān)毅

Book 2020quinas’ doctrine of being can be better understood through Frege’s distinction between the ‘there is’ sense and the ‘present actuality’ sense of being, as interpreted by Peter Geach and Anthony Kenny. Aquinas’ notion of essence becomes clearer in the light of Frege’s distinction between objects and

Corral

Ersatzsicherheiten im Kreditgesch?fthilosophy..As for the second division, I show that Thomas was . a neo-Platonist but . an Aristotelian and indeed it is in his Aristotelianism that the distinctive contribution of his work is to be found.

arthroplasty

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68205-9homas’s most original transcendental is analysed, namely “.”. This can be better understood in the light of Frege’s insights into the non-empirical nature of number. Furthermore, this same section shows the similarity between this transcendental and Frege’s logical negation operator.

Scleroderma

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68205-9his metaphysics a series of notions, which later would have been conceived as different concepts or different logical symbols, were already present . the first level predicate, the existential quantifier, the assertion sign, the logical negation operator, the notion of concept as function.