找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Approval Voting; Steven J. Brams,Peter C. Fishburn Book 2007Latest edition Springer-Verlag New York 2007 Election.Elections.Electoral.Elec

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 戰(zhàn)神
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 07:23:20 | 只看該作者
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 09:49:09 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06663-5ce in practice. Similarly, the earlier findings on sincerity, strategy-proofness, and Condorcet candidates facilitate theoretical comparisons among different systems but do not demonstrate whether, in a particular election, a Condorcet candidate was or could have been elected if voting was sincere.
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 12:37:43 | 只看該作者
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 17:56:59 | 只看該作者
Wolfgang J. Friedl,Karsten Weicheltaries (Section 1.3); the 1976 House Majority Leader contest (Chapter 4); the 1959 Boston mayoral race (Section 6.6); and the 1970 United States Senate election in New York (Section 7.5), in which we also looked at possible polling effects. In this chapter, we shall examine what seems almost a repris
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 20:31:56 | 只看該作者
Wolfgang J. Friedl,Karsten Weicheltincluded in this election was the most significant independent or third-party candidate since George Wallace in 1968, whose impact on the 1968 race we assessed in Section 8.3. As we shall show, the outcome of the 1980 race would not have changed under approval voting, but the independent candidate,
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 00:23:49 | 只看該作者
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 06:35:30 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06663-5ce in practice. Similarly, the earlier findings on sincerity, strategy-proofness, and Condorcet candidates facilitate theoretical comparisons among different systems but do not demonstrate whether, in a particular election, a Condorcet candidate was or could have been elected if voting was sincere.
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 11:08:44 | 只看該作者
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 12:51:17 | 只看該作者
Book 2007Latest editions - and their generally favorable experience with it. After a generation of discussion and debate on the subject, the authors remain convinced that "Approval Voting" is as relevant today as it was when rigorous analysis and systematic empirical research on this election reform began more than 30 yea
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 20:25:01 | 只看該作者
- and their generally favorable experience with it. After a generation of discussion and debate on the subject, the authors remain convinced that "Approval Voting" is as relevant today as it was when rigorous analysis and systematic empirical research on this election reform began more than 30 yea978-0-387-49895-9978-0-387-49896-6
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-14 12:33
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
天津市| 宜章县| 晋江市| 谢通门县| 额济纳旗| 永昌县| 万宁市| 陵川县| 宣汉县| 综艺| 庆云县| 同仁县| 出国| 应用必备| 卫辉市| 阿图什市| 当阳市| 阿克| 双城市| 灌阳县| 和顺县| 勃利县| 昆明市| 静海县| 隆化县| 屏南县| 汉寿县| 江津市| 拉萨市| 庆城县| 漾濞| 平利县| 化隆| 昭平县| 重庆市| 普宁市| 旺苍县| 灵川县| 永和县| 拉萨市| 通江县|