Titlebook: Applied Research for Better Practice; Angela Everitt,Pauline Hardiker,Audrey Mullender Textbook 1992Latest edition British Association of

輪流

全國(guó)性

Policy Principles and Agenda-Settingfor research-minded practice. We consider in this chapter particular aspects of research methodology, particularly those of participatory research, that may usefully inform the practice methodology of the researchminded practitioner.

Delirium

Research and Practice,s not a research methods text. Our intention is not to provide advice and guidance to enable social workers to undertake research or even to implement the findings from research into their practice. Rather our aim is to learn from research methodology and methods so as to contribute to the developme

rods366

FAR

倔強(qiáng)不能

A Methodology for the Research-minded Practitioner,ch and practice, and the following chapters which focus on stages of the practice process: formulating the issues and preparation, groundwork and access; engaging with subjects to generate data; analysing practice data; and evaluating practice. Our intention now is to begin to develop a methodology

Interlocking

Formulating the Issues in Research-minded Practice,dures, the current legal position and the perspectives of social workers and their managers. Similar situations may or may not lead a client to seek help, a social worker to open a case file, a court to make an order. (Hardiker, Exton and Barker, 1989: 112)

Supplement

cutlery

,The Practitioner—Evaluator, by research methodologies. Research and evaluation go together. In this chapter we develop a model which moves responsibility for evaluation from the external ‘expert’ or the top-down manager to the practitioner and her team.

BAIL

Conclusion, passionately believed that the practice-versus-research traditions in social work could be dismantled through the development of new kinds of critical, reflective practice. By this we mean particular ways of thinking about social work theory and practice, such as: