Titlebook: Anticipatory Action in Self-Defence; Essence and Limits u Kinga Tibori Szabó Book 2011 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2011

Spinal-Tap

The Interpretation of Self-Defence and the United Nationsly as well as relevant reports and discussions of the International Law Commission are discussed. The applicable findings of the 2004 UN High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change are also given attention. Further, relevant judgments of the International Court of Justice are analysed on the

比賽用背帶

The Temporal Dimension of Post-Charter Self-Defenceer, it reviews the challenges posed to that dimension by conflicts involving weapons of mass destruction and non-state actors, as elaborated in . and .. Chapter 12 also takes into consideration the influence of judicial decisions, legal doctrine and the work of various UN organs on self-defence. The

法律的瑕疵

inventory

The Limits of Anticipatory Action in Self-Defencery action in self-defence is legal. The discussion of these conditions is grouped according to the type of armed attacks that can threaten a particular state. Accordingly, the present chapter first elaborates on the conditions of necessity and proportionality in case of standard-type armed attacks,

嘲笑

Instrumental

Self-Defence in State-to-State Conflictsd. The comparison between cases entailing anticipatory action and those involving remedial action assesses whether the limits of these two dimensions are identical or dissimilar in post-Charter state practice. The aim of this chapter is to examine the temporal dimension of self-defence as interprete

myriad

招待

Hearing the Nature of Compact Objectsd. The comparison between cases entailing anticipatory action and those involving remedial action assesses whether the limits of these two dimensions are identical or dissimilar in post-Charter state practice. The aim of this chapter is to examine the temporal dimension of self-defence as interprete

hemorrhage

harbinger

Book 2011s the temporal dimension of self-defence: when and for how long can a state defend itself against an armed attack? Can it resort to armed force before such an attack occurs? Is anticipatory action covered by the rules of self-defence or should it be treated as a different concept? This book examines