Titlebook: Animals, Race, and Multiculturalism; Luís Cordeiro-Rodrigues,Les Mitchell Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under

里程碑

Malcontent

Vlasis Oikonomou,Martin Patel,Ernst Worrell, whether cultural reasons can be fairly used to deny animal rights. The chapter considers two examples in which cultural reasons were invoked to deny animal rights, and animal rights endeavours were cast as racist. It examines both African and Western conceptions of animals and argues that almost a

辭職

Volker H Hoffmann,Thomas Trautmannire to protect non-human animals, but to denigrate minorities. I compare the parliamentary debate on banning bullfights in Catalonia with the Dutch parliamentary debate on banning unstunned ritual slaughter. The analysis reveals that existing political cleavages predict the position of political par

富饒

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2662-3re religious ethics and foundational secular ethics. Multiculturalism defends cultural traditions, but what stand might multiculturalists take with regard to traditions that breach fundamental moral dictates? More specifically, when forced to decide between the protection and preservation of religio

小平面

骯臟

厭煩

Successful Franchising Using the Plural Formculturalism imply that minority cultural practices involving animals should be exempted from animal welfare/animal cruelty provisions?; (2) do Western societies apply different standards to minority practices involving animals than to majority practices, labelling minority practices as “cruel” and “

無力更進

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66568-9animal welfare; non-human animals; treatment of animals; wellbeing; racism; ethics; culture

我不死扛

innovation