找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Animals, Ethics, and Language; The Philosophy of Me Rebekah Humphreys Book 2023 The Editor(s)(if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclu

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 32921|回復(fù): 40
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:14:03 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
期刊全稱Animals, Ethics, and Language
期刊簡稱The Philosophy of Me
影響因子2023Rebekah Humphreys
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/158/157735/157735.mp4
發(fā)行地址Applies the findings of cognitive ethology to animal ethics.Synthesizes the work of critical animal theorists, philosophers, and cognitive ethologists.Explores how the debates concerning anthropomorph
學(xué)科分類The Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series
圖書封面Titlebook: Animals, Ethics, and Language; The Philosophy of Me Rebekah Humphreys Book 2023 The Editor(s)(if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclu
影響因子.With an ever-growing body of evidence on the links between different oppressions, never have the debates in Critical Animal Studies surrounding intersectionality in relation to animal ethics been more important. In particular, the arguments related to anthropomorphic attributes of mentality to other than humans promise to provide fruitful new ground for re-assessing human-animal relations. This book maps the central debates surrounding anthropomorphism in relation to our descriptions of animals, their lives, animal mentality, and meaningful communication in the nonhuman world. Rebekah Humphreys synthesizes the work of critical animal theorists, philosophers, and cognitive ethologists, and provides a critical account of how the debates concerning anthropomorphism play a key role in a proper understanding of animal ethics..
Pindex Book 2023
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language被引頻次




書目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language年度引用




書目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language讀者反饋




書目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:40:02 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:55:33 | 只看該作者
Amitava Krishna Dutt,Charles K. Wilberseen to be based on this view in part or have some their roots in this view are archaic and morally backward-looking. It is worth noting that factory farming, by its very nature, treats animals as machines. Fortunately, discussions surrounding animal mentality and anthropomorphism are not only subje
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:13:25 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:54:04 | 只看該作者
Amitava Krishna Dutt,Charles K. Wilberhat can be adopted to elucidate correct anthropomorphic practices. Animals’ ‘mindedness’ can be ‘seen’, for it is embodied in their expressions, movements, and behaviours. But what of incorrect anthropomorphic practices? What can be said of these? Acceptance of the plausibility of critical anthropom
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:29:46 | 只看該作者
Production, Income, and Economic Growthntold suffering upon animals for even trivial purposes. That such suffering is the norm is in many ways unbelievable (but sadly all too true) in the light of the fact that many people would consider such a belief to be archaic. However, despite this, there remains a deep anxiety—in philosophy, scien
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:17:29 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:27:09 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32080-4Critical Animal Studies; posthumanism; animal ethics; animal cognition; Anthropomorphism
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:15:35 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:58:05 | 只看該作者
Rebekah HumphreysApplies the findings of cognitive ethology to animal ethics.Synthesizes the work of critical animal theorists, philosophers, and cognitive ethologists.Explores how the debates concerning anthropomorph
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-18 16:54
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
肥城市| 义乌市| 焉耆| 普兰县| 梁平县| 台东县| 镇远县| 漳州市| 分宜县| 华蓥市| 仁化县| 商都县| 朝阳县| 定西市| 郓城县| 遵化市| 渝中区| 招远市| 丰县| 城口县| 靖州| 利川市| 武强县| 民权县| 民乐县| 和田县| 黄浦区| 尤溪县| 玉门市| 竹溪县| 柳江县| 南涧| 介休市| 南陵县| 宜川县| 绍兴县| 贺州市| 攀枝花市| 共和县| 栾川县| 新源县|