Titlebook: Animal Suffering: Philosophy and Culture; Elisa Aaltola Book 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2012 emot

衰退

書目名稱Animal Suffering: Philosophy and Culture影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Animal Suffering: Philosophy and Culture影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Animal Suffering: Philosophy and Culture網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Animal Suffering: Philosophy and Culture網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Animal Suffering: Philosophy and Culture被引頻次




書目名稱Animal Suffering: Philosophy and Culture被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Animal Suffering: Philosophy and Culture年度引用




書目名稱Animal Suffering: Philosophy and Culture年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Animal Suffering: Philosophy and Culture讀者反饋




書目名稱Animal Suffering: Philosophy and Culture讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

挫敗

Additional Economic Planning Methods,mentalist view towards other animals, according to which those animals are primarily things to be used rather than individuals with their own value. The use of other animals varies from breeding companion animals for profit, racing dogs and horses and keeping zoos or visiting animal circuses, to hun

enumaerate

Economic Evaluations in Explorationne argument is that animal suffering is, in fact, both extremely difficult (if not impossible) to define, and that we can never know for sure whether an animal suffers. This sceptical take on animal suffering gains its foothold from the inherently subjective nature of suffering: suffering is a subje

分解

時代

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48808-5 it concentrates merely on argumentation and logic instead of what ought to be immediate and obvious (Diamond 2004). That is, reasoned analyses can distract us from what is right in front of us: what is easy and immediately known becomes something complicated and obscure. This argument has become in

圍巾

的是兄弟

細(xì)節(jié)

Morality and Non-Human Suffering: Analytical Animal Ethics,mal ethics’. This field of philosophy, which has gained momentum since the 1970s, concerns itself with the moral status of non-human animals and, more broadly, with the normative elements of the human-animal relationship. Quite simply, it asks: what is the moral value of animals, and how ought animals to be treated?

lobster

Action against Suffering,voted attention to the question of why animal suffering matters, while explorations of the type of action that should be taken to eradicate that suffering have remained less frequent. Here we come back to the theme of advocacy.

DEVIL

Concluding Words,ist’, nor can it be reduced to rare acts of sadism; it is not inevitable or exceptional, but, rather, the consequence of anthropocentric hierarchies and the types of egoism that they feed. That is, the suffering of other animals is all too often the consequence of human actions carried out in the name of human gain and power.