Titlebook: Animal Minds in Medieval Latin Philosophy; A Sourcebook from Au Anselm Oelze Textbook 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 Animal Cogni

完成才會(huì)征服

Optimising Investment in Regulated Airportseasurable. However, the question is whether an emotional reaction to or qualification of an object (e.g. as pleasurable) surpasses the level of the sensory soul and thus goes beyond the mental abilities of nonhuman animals. This is one of the fundamental questions Albert tries to answer.

收養(yǎng)

Introduction: Modern and Medieval Philosophy of Animal Minds,amely, insofar as they scrutinised their cognition, emotions, and volitions. The introduction highlights the most important concepts of the contemporary debate and explains how they compare to the medieval discussion.

preservative

Perception, Knowledge, Reason, and Mind (Augustine, ,, Chapters 25–28)humans or angels. Therefore, Augustine and Evodius engage in a lively discussion of human and animal cognition and finally agree on a number of points that were to remain influential throughout the entire medieval debate.

和音

Modes of Estimation (Avicenna Latinus, ,, Book IV, Chapter 3)ly resembles what contemporary psychologists use to term ‘a(chǎn)ssociative learning’. The example that Avicenna gives in this context is a dog that learns to fear sticks?by associating the perception of its form with the experience of pain.?This example?was adopted (sometimes with slight modifications) in various Latin texts on animal minds.

carotid-bruit

Estimation and Concept Formation (John Blund, ,, Chapter 19)erceptual contents? Differently speaking, does the sheep see wolves rather than grey furry things? If it does, can it also combine various concepts and form propositions which are true or false? Questions as these puzzled many thirteenth-century thinkers, and John Blund was one of the first to provide an answer to them.

heckle

Memory, Learning, and Prudence (Albert the Great, ,, Book I, Treatise 1, Chapter 6)man animals can be called prudent, at least in a broader sense of the term. Thus, the sixth chapter of the first part of book I of his . commentary (written around 1264) is an interesting example of his attempt to combine the interpretation of Aristotle with a satisfactory explanation of animal behaviour.

FLIRT

Learning, Language, and Reasoning(Albert the Great, ,, Book 21, Treatise 1, Chapters 2–4)t’s account is not based on empirical research, unlike modern theories of animal psychology, his commentary shows interesting parallels to contemporary views and it is undoubtedly a substantial and important contribution to medieval zoology.

fatty-streak

Foresight and Deliberation (Roger Bacon, ,, Book II)ristotle’s denial of reason and deliberation to nonhuman animals. Nevertheless, he introduces some subtle and interesting terminological distinctions in order to capture the cognitive capacities of ants, spiders, and other animals.

團(tuán)結(jié)

簡潔