Titlebook: Animal Ethics and the Autonomous Animal Self; Natalie Thomas Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 autonomy.agenc

變色龍

craven

Kantian Ethics and Animals,ne who is owed direct moral consideration, and this chapter examines the possibility of incorporating animals into Kantian ethics based on some of the recent work performed by neo-Kantian scholars. By arguing that animals should be considered minimally rational and autonomous, Thomas claims that ani

織物

sleep-spindles

URN

Cpr951

Chen Huiguang,Futian Qu,Chen Ligenccurately understood as existing in both animals and humans and at minimal and rich levels. Its value as the grounds for direct moral obligations towards animals is provided and the chapter concludes with an explanation of the specific ways we can respect autonomy in its different forms and at both levels.

eardrum

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0461-2 and autonomy in animals are neglected. In this chapter, Thomas claims that Gruen’s view of entangled empathy can work in conjunction with the view that animals are autonomous agents, and concludes with an explanation of how this can be achieved for the betterment of human and animal relationships.

并置

Animals as Agents,umans, the chapter provides an overview of arguments that support the claim that animals are able to direct their own actions in more or less complex ways. Further to this, Thomas concludes by exploring the idea that some animals can also be considered as minimal moral agents.

cultivated

Autonomy and Animals,ccurately understood as existing in both animals and humans and at minimal and rich levels. Its value as the grounds for direct moral obligations towards animals is provided and the chapter concludes with an explanation of the specific ways we can respect autonomy in its different forms and at both levels.

Minuet