Titlebook: Anglo-American Diplomacy and the Palestinian Refugee Problem, 1948-51; Simon A. Waldman Book 2015 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Au

津貼

Book 2015This volume examines British and US attitudes towards the means and mechanisms for the facilitation of an Arab-Israeli reconciliation, focusing specifically on the refugee factor in diplomatic initiatives. It explains why Britain and the US were unable to reconcile the local parties to an agreement on the future of the Palestinian refugees.

ferment

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137431523Palestine; Israel; refugees; expulsion; exodus; peace process; conciliation; compensation; UNRWA; PCC; ESM; Uni

收藏品

The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2015

路標(biāo)

Security, Conflict and Cooperation in the Contemporary Worldhttp://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/157453.jpg

甜食

,The Palestine Factor in Anglo-American Post-War Middle Eastern Policy, 1945–48,ht and the freezing over of the River Thames, the British Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin told parliament, ‘The course of events has led His Majesty’s Government to decide that the problem of Palestine must be referred to the United Nations… The Mandatory Power cannot go on for ever.’.

violate

背心

Stricture

無聊點好

Berge-Zhukovskii Optimal Nash Equilibria mechanism for immediate refugee relief had been established through UN General Assembly Resolution 212. By the end of 1949, this emergency relief programme had been extended for the following year, as recommended under General Assembly Resolution 302 (IV)..

裝飾

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07494-8in the post-war period. President Truman supported Jewish immigration into Palestine as well as the partitioning of the country. Britain feared that such a policy would estrange the Arab states and was concerned about its own presence in Palestine where 100,000 British troops were stationed.