Titlebook: Analytical Theory of Democracy; History, Mathematics Andranik Tangian Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 Arrow‘s Paradox.Condorc

尋找

Concluding Discussion computable optimal compromises as opposed to axiom consistency analysis in social choice. As for political philosophy, the focus is made on public determination in the sense of the Rousseauvian general will referred to by Borda and Condorcet, as opposed to the individual determination considered in

辭職

VEN

輕率看法

Constructing the 2013 German Political Spectrumt the positions of 28 German parties on 38 policy issues shortly before the 2013 Bundestag (federal) election. They are arranged into 28 38-dimensional vectors understood as the parties’ policy profiles, and the correlation between them is regarded as a proximity measure. The political spectrum— a c

Virtues

1614-0311 Revolutions. This method is tested in a series of election experiments that focus on implementation details. In addition, non-societal applications such as MCDM, finance or traffic control are considered, where978-3-030-39692-3978-3-030-39691-6Series ISSN 1614-0311 Series E-ISSN 2197-8530

陳腐的人

Korbla P. Puplampu,George O. Essegbeyovernment are illustrated by the views of Thucydides, Pericles, Plato, and Aristotle. Finally, we describe Aristotle’s mathematical model (though textually expressed) that explains the principle of decision making in a democracy, an oligarchy, and a mixed state, which combines elements of them both.

Admonish

SYN

Atmosphere

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14160-7ons, is not appropriate as a universal tool of democratic decision making. In 1951, Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem established that egalitarian, majoritybased democracy has its limits; beyond these limits, only a hierarchy headed with a ‘first man’ can operate as its extension, which resembles the st

Interregnum