Titlebook: Analytical Philosophy in Comparative Perspective; Exploratory Essays i Bimal Krishna Matilal,Jaysankar Lal Shaw Book 1985 D. Reidel Publish

反抗日本

書目名稱Analytical Philosophy in Comparative Perspective影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Analytical Philosophy in Comparative Perspective影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Analytical Philosophy in Comparative Perspective網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Analytical Philosophy in Comparative Perspective網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Analytical Philosophy in Comparative Perspective被引頻次




書目名稱Analytical Philosophy in Comparative Perspective被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Analytical Philosophy in Comparative Perspective年度引用




書目名稱Analytical Philosophy in Comparative Perspective年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Analytical Philosophy in Comparative Perspective讀者反饋




書目名稱Analytical Philosophy in Comparative Perspective讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Nomogram

祖先

The Syncategorematic Treatment of Predicates,ressions which are .. He then says that “What distinguishes a name is that it can stand coherently in the place of a variable in predication, and will yield true results when used to instantiate true universal quantifications.”. That statement is followed immediately by the claim that “Predicates ar

penance

Substance and Kind: Reflections on the New Theory of Reference, comfortable words. The extension of a (singular or general) term is, we are told, the class of things “it applies to”, and its intension is that associated feature of the term in virtue of which it so applies—roughly, an assemblage of non-question-begging necessary conditions which are jointly suff

星星

The Easy Examination Paradox,d obvious. Call it ‘the strong intuition’. In this paper I defend the strong intuition against an only too familiar argument discussed in an only too familiar literature. This defence requires that I solve a version of the examination paradox. But we will see that it is, unfortunately, only an easy

PIZZA

Some Problems Concerning Meaning,oting purpose itself—describe it in two different ways. This is such a simple phenomenon that none but philosophers could get interested in it. May not a particular thing, or even a particular class of things, have two or more distinguishing features, and may we not distinguish it, specify it or poi

死亡率

,Abstraction, Analysis and Universals: The Navya-Nyāya Theory,n specially suited to solve one type of problem, fails, for that very reason, to solve other, conflicting, types of problems. From the very nature of the case it would appear impossible to have one concept to do all of the work which is naively expected of it.

身體萌芽

Psychologism in Indian Logical Theory,persistent problems in philosophy of logic, which are generally discussed within the framework of Western thinking. The new possibilities that they open up could be instructive, at least by way of extending the boundaries of our available models, and we may be able, as a consequence, to see some of

eczema

contrast-medium

,The Prābhākara Mimā?sā Theory of Related Designation,, the designated relation theory of the Bhā??a Mīmāmsakas and the Naiyāyaikas, and the related designation theory of the Prabhakara Mimamsakas..The first and second of these theories are relatively well understood. Brough, for instance, has given a clear articulation and able defense of the sentence