Titlebook: Analytical Issues in Participatory Natural Resources; Bhaskar Vira (University Assistant Lecturer in Env Book 2001 Palgrave Macmillan, a d

大方不好

defibrillator

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30324-4debate is Oakley and Marsden’s (1984) review of discourses and practices, in which they suggest four broad understandings: (1) informing and mobilising target groups; (2) community development; (3) organising target groups; and (4) empowering beneficiaries. They clearly favoured the last two, and cr

Adulate

失望昨天

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-84188-9together some 318 households) are adjacent to a mangrove forest of 416 hectares, which provides forest products and environmental services that are a vital component of the subsistence livelihood systems of the villagers. The context for the collaborative management of mangroves at Kipumbwi and Sang

內(nèi)行

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-84188-9-participatory. That question appears settled: natural resource management is to be participatory. For almost a decade now, participatory management philosophy has been the dominant guiding force in the forestry sector in India, Nepal and Bhutan. For instance, community and private forestry are the

Arb853

Allgemeine Optimierungsmethodenganisation, Oxfam GB. and some of its national counterparts. It describes a methodological approach to assessment of environmental impacts of community-centred development and elaborates on the impact of adopting this approach on local people’s livelihoods and environments and on organisational capa

LAVA

2否定

頭腦冷靜

Allgemeine Optimierungsmethodenuses); as well as performing environmental services (indirect uses), and often having religious or cultural significance (non-use values). Even small ‘patches’ of forest may be used by people from several villages or hamlets; and different sub-groups within a particular hamlet or village may derive

吃掉