Titlebook: Analysis and Metaphysics; Essays in Honor of R Keith Lehrer Book 1975 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1975 epistemology.et

積聚

書目名稱Analysis and Metaphysics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Analysis and Metaphysics影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Analysis and Metaphysics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Analysis and Metaphysics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Analysis and Metaphysics被引頻次




書目名稱Analysis and Metaphysics被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Analysis and Metaphysics年度引用




書目名稱Analysis and Metaphysics年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Analysis and Metaphysics讀者反饋




書目名稱Analysis and Metaphysics讀者反饋學科排名

酷熱

Chisholm on Sensing and Perceivingpistemic rules, and his defense of a foundational theory of empirical knowledge. Yet I believe that a less noticed area of his work may well have more important consequences for future developments in philosophy. I am referring to his nonepistemic theses about perception, especially his development

Chipmunk

Jingoism

Reason and Consistencyncorrect, for him to think the set of statements is consistent. Moreover, it may even be reasonable for a person to accept a set of statements he is certain is inconsistent. A person who has discovered that he accepts an inconsistent set of statements may reasonably continue to do so when, for lack

Pessary

Epistemic Values and Epistemic Viewpointsthat is essentially evaluative in character. In . he bases his account on the relation of being-more-worthy-of-belief. Elsewhere, the relation of being-more-reasonable-than and the relation of beingepistemically-preferable-to are chosen.. We undertake here a similar project. Our choice of such a pri

漸變

Confirmation, Explanation and Acceptancesiderable impetus to investigations of the connections among such locutions as ‘a(chǎn)cceptable’, ‘evident’ and ‘probable’. Chisholm has suggested that it is reasonable for a person to believe or accept any proposition that is more probable than not in relation to the totality of what he or she knows,. a

圓錐

‘I Know that I am in Pain’ is Senselessgument by raising the question, essentially, of who says one cannot legitimately use such and such a set of concepts as a basis for an account of analyticity. What is and is not obscure is not lightly to be legislated; nor is it a matter to be settled by philosophical fashion. In doing an article fo

defendant

Knowledge and the Self-Presenting color. Yet, nonetheless, the man may be such that he . that there is a table before him. Some philosophers — Empiricists — have suggested that what happens is this: (1) there is a real table, which the man is in front of; (2) there are real perceptions, distinct from the table, which the man is exp

BIPED

無思維能力