Titlebook: An Investigation of the Causal Inference between Epidemiology and Jurisprudence; Minsoo Jung Book 2018 The Author(s) 2018 Causal Inference

evanescent

Ansteckungsart und Verbreitung, causal relations between individual victims’ diseases and exposures are presumed based on prevalence rates among populations, a point of connection between epidemiology and jurisprudence is created. Epidemiology carefully examines whether observational associations among particular events are genui

PLUMP

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48445-2sponsibility have developed from the existing responsibility for illegal harmful acts into struggles over a new legal principle since the legislation of the South Korean Product Liability Act. According to this legal principle, tobacco is a defective product, and criminal defendants can be charged w

我沒有命令

Thyroid-Gland

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48445-2 by making use of counterfactual inferences have been underway since the mid-20th century. The strongest position regarding this, the potential outcome approach, argues that, with the exception of randomized controlled trials, causal relations must not be acknowledged when evaluating causality. On t

dry-eye

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48445-2s. Consequently, given adequate time, the controversy over causal relations between harmful materials and diseases will be mainly resolved. However, judges cannot wait for this and must make legal value judgments on causal relations as a requirement for the establishment of illegal acts. In other wo

Oratory

judicial

SpringerBriefs in Philosophyhttp://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/155624.jpg

膝蓋

An Investigation of the Causal Inference between Epidemiology and Jurisprudence978-981-10-7862-0Series ISSN 2211-4548 Series E-ISSN 2211-4556

bile648

2211-4548 ionally use the results of epidemiological studies in lawsui.This book examines how legal causation inference and epidemiological causal inference can be harmonized within the realm of jurisprudence, exploring why legal causation and epidemiological causation differ from each other and defining rela

記成螞蟻

Book 2018why legal causation and epidemiological causation differ from each other and defining related problems. The book also discusses how legal justice can be realized and how victims’ rights can be protected. It looks at epidemiological evidence pertaining to causal relationships in cases such as smoking