Titlebook: An Introduction to the Language of Category Theory; Steven Roman Textbook 2017 The Author(s) 2017 Category Theory.Category.Functor.Adjoint

ALOOF

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)An Introduction to the Language of Category Theory影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)An Introduction to the Language of Category Theory影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)An Introduction to the Language of Category Theory網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)An Introduction to the Language of Category Theory網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)An Introduction to the Language of Category Theory被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)An Introduction to the Language of Category Theory被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)An Introduction to the Language of Category Theory年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)An Introduction to the Language of Category Theory年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)An Introduction to the Language of Category Theory讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)An Introduction to the Language of Category Theory讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

爭(zhēng)論

Adjoints,eory that comes before it. It has also been said that adjoints are both unifying and ubiquitious in mathematics and have a strong and powerful presence in other disciplines as well, such as computer science.

Range-Of-Motion

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64605-2y theory, one often wishes to speak of “the category of (all) sets” or “the category of (all) groups.” However, it is well known that these descriptions cannot be made precise within the context of sets alone.

burnish

Bezugsrahmen und Gestaltungsempfehlungen,eory that comes before it. It has also been said that adjoints are both unifying and ubiquitious in mathematics and have a strong and powerful presence in other disciplines as well, such as computer science.

congenial

muscle-fibers

Conscientious

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64605-2Let us now take a closer look at functors, beginning with some additional examples.

N防腐劑

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64605-2Let us recall the definition of a comma category (mid level of generalization). If . is a functor and . is an (anchor) object, then the comma category (.?→?.) is the category whose objects are the pairs.for .. Moreover, a morphism.between comma objects is essentially just a morphism .: .?→?. in . for which.(We have dropped the overbar notation ..)

MULTI

Wissen, Innovationen und ProzesseWe wish to continue our exploration of universality with some additional examples. For this, we need to define a few more categorical concepts.

散步