Titlebook: An Introduction to Criminological Theory and the Problem of Causation; Jason Warr Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s

櫥柜

書目名稱An Introduction to Criminological Theory and the Problem of Causation影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱An Introduction to Criminological Theory and the Problem of Causation影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱An Introduction to Criminological Theory and the Problem of Causation網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱An Introduction to Criminological Theory and the Problem of Causation網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱An Introduction to Criminological Theory and the Problem of Causation被引頻次




書目名稱An Introduction to Criminological Theory and the Problem of Causation被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱An Introduction to Criminological Theory and the Problem of Causation年度引用




書目名稱An Introduction to Criminological Theory and the Problem of Causation年度引用學科排名




書目名稱An Introduction to Criminological Theory and the Problem of Causation讀者反饋




書目名稱An Introduction to Criminological Theory and the Problem of Causation讀者反饋學科排名

分解

Die Sozialstruktur Deutschlandsl reasoning into criminological theorising. As such, the chapter revisits the four problems identified in . and explains how the INUS model either avoids or overcomes these problems. This will also involve a brief examination of the problem posed by the Rosenthal Effect (researcher bias) in scientific research and theory construction.

LEVER

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47446-5philosophy; social sciences; theory construction; natural sciences; deviant casual chains; refutations; cr

放棄

小口啜飲

Zum Begriff der Sozialstruktur,plain why the problem of causation has been such a thorn in the side of both philosophy and the natural/social sciences. It notes that the field of criminology essentially has three core aims: defining crime, explaining how crime occurs and deciding what to do about crime. It explains the aetiologic

放大

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-95667-5e following question: why is a poor understanding of causal mechanisms, and causal explanations, a problem for theoretical criminology? I then set out the four main reasons why a poor understanding of causal argument is indeed a problem for criminology and how these issues can impact on understandin

懸掛

Zum Begriff der Sozialstruktur,ausal reasoning, based on an ‘if . then .’ construction, is known as the Humean regularity, or chain, model of causation. It is argued here that this form of reasoning has been implicitly employed throughout the history of the social and criminological sciences. Utilising, and introducing the reader

情感脆弱

Private Lebensformen im Wandel,g for criminology and the social sciences. The chapter discusses two central themes: firstly, the Humean model’s relationship to causal generalisations and its subsequent vulnerability to open and direct refutation through the problem of deviant causal chains – where a set of antecedent conditions d

朦朧

Zum Begriff der Sozialstruktur,c theories from the history of criminological thought shall be given a somewhat brief exposition and the underlying deductive Humean causal framework will be exposed and made explicit. The four examples that have been chosen for exposition are Classical theory, Biological Positivism, Strain theory a

1分開