Titlebook: An Integrative Model of Moral Deliberation; J. Jeffrey Tillman Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Dual Process

choleric

書(shū)目名稱An Integrative Model of Moral Deliberation影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱An Integrative Model of Moral Deliberation影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱An Integrative Model of Moral Deliberation網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱An Integrative Model of Moral Deliberation網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱An Integrative Model of Moral Deliberation被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱An Integrative Model of Moral Deliberation被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱An Integrative Model of Moral Deliberation年度引用




書(shū)目名稱An Integrative Model of Moral Deliberation年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱An Integrative Model of Moral Deliberation讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱An Integrative Model of Moral Deliberation讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

florid

crockery

懶惰民族

Dual Process Theories and Moral Deliberation,volved in those theories are respectively characterized as an experiential/intuitive process, largely rooted in biological and nonconscious elements but shaped by social/environmental factors (Type 1) and a reflective/analytic process that is formal, mathematical, and entirely conscious (Type 2). Th

Jogging

septicemia

Narrative and Moral Deliberation,. It is argued that there are two ways to construct narratives: one by means of Type 1 processes and the other by means of Type 2 processes. Type 1 narratives are the most critical because they provide not merely representations of the flow of human experience, but the possibility of simulating the

Nonflammable

雜役

Conclusion,, including not just applied ethics, but the sciences, literary studies, and the fine arts. A serious embrace of the centrality of Type 1 processes in decision making and moral valuation creates the responsibility of each discipline to investigate the character and impact of such sensibilities on th

內(nèi)行

Human Embodiment and Moral Deliberation, Many of these operations remain nonevident to human consciousness or are mediated into awareness through basic emotions, but the persistent denial of their impact in most of Western intellectual thought since Descartes is one source of the artificiality present in contemporary moral deliberation.

擴(kuò)張

Type 1 Moral Cognition,hics under one process. This model is then applied to specifically moral cognitions to develop an aesthetic model of moral cognition that portrays moral deliberation as a struggle regarding proper aesthetic sensibilities of rightness and wrongness.