Titlebook: An Identity Theory of Truth; Julian Dodd Book 2000 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2000

GERM

書目名稱An Identity Theory of Truth影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱An Identity Theory of Truth影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱An Identity Theory of Truth網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書目名稱An Identity Theory of Truth網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱An Identity Theory of Truth被引頻次




書目名稱An Identity Theory of Truth被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱An Identity Theory of Truth年度引用




書目名稱An Identity Theory of Truth年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱An Identity Theory of Truth讀者反饋




書目名稱An Identity Theory of Truth讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

PRE

Propositions, Indirect Speech and Truthbearers,acts is by no means obligatory because the truthmaker principle is itself lacking a respectable motivation. This conclusion, at one stroke, undermines the main reason for supposing facts to be states of affairs: complexes of entities from the realm of reference. But if facts are not states of affair

Devastate

The Nature of Propositions: Thoughts versus States of Affairs,g is the proposition denoted by the demonstrative ‘that’ of an attitude-ascription? Two rival conceptions of the nature of propositions have been particularly influential in analytical philosophy. Proponents of the respective accounts agree that propositions are abstract, structured entities which e

山羊

Facts are True Thoughts,truthmakers. My charge was that such a conception rests on a myth: namely, that truths need truthmakers at all. Having denied that facts need be seen as truthmakers, we noted that we had thereby undermined the major motivation for taking facts to be states of affairs: complexes of worldly objects an

宣誓書

From Correspondence to Identity,een reached, we can offer a final, neat reply to any correspondence theorist. Facts are not states of affairs which make thoughts true. The supposed truthmaker is the truthbearer. The relation holding between a true thought and a fact is not that of . — a relation which holds between an entity and .

并入

A Variety of Deflationism Defended,n that facts are identical with true thoughts enables us to appreciate the untenability of correspondence theories; and once we achieve this insight, we are left free to adopt a deflationary theory. In this sense, then, an adoption of the perspective afforded us by the modest identity theory acts as

Adrenaline

我吃花盤旋

手榴彈

Propositions, Indirect Speech and Truthbearers,onstrued along (roughly) Fregean lines: something with senses, as opposed to entities from the realm of reference, as constituents.. However, the idea that our ontology should include thoughts is controversial; so before the identification of facts with true thoughts can be argued for, the case for the existence of thoughts must be made.

前面

Truthmakers, Facts and States of Affairs: a Critique of Correspondence,ter part of this book (Chapters 1 to 4) has two main objectives: first of all, to uncover the substantial doctrine held by correspondence theorists; but second, and more significantly, to expose this credo as a myth. Precisely . it is mythological is a question whose consideration propels us towards a more satisfying way of thinking about truth.