Titlebook: An Expressive Theory of Punishment; Bill Wringe Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 argue.crime.philosophy.soci

Compatriot

Umwandlung der Plankosten in Sollkosten case: the punishment of corporations under domestic law; in the next chapter I shall focus on something which one might take to be considerably more problematic: the punishability of states under international law.

Rheumatologist

Punishment: Some Questions Philosophers Asky adequate definition of punishment. It also need not involve anything that deserves the title of a philosophical . of punishment. Still, one might wonder why one should need anything more than this fairly minimal understanding of punishment.

Seizure

淺灘

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-01902-2 to. As we saw in Chapter 2, advocates of different versions of expressivism have answered this second question in a number of different ways: some have supposed that the primary audience for the messages that punishment involves are offenders, and others have supposed that it is society at large.

有說服力

懸崖

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-01902-2ut the expressive function of punishment. If we do so, we can avoid a problem which some recent authors have taken to stand in the way of any attempt to justify punishment. The problem arises from consideration of what appears to be a truism: when we punish people, we intend to make them suffer.

有常識

小步走路

Durchführung der Plankalkulationme extent, on the idea that — in the paradigmatic case — an offender who is punished is a member of the political community which expresses its commitment to a set of norms by inflicting harsh treatment on him or her.

Albinism

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-07030-6sion of the expressive view that I defended in the first half of the book. In this chapter, I aim to apply some of the insights from that discussion to a rather different issue: the question of whether we should regard states as potential subjects of punishment under international criminal law.

赦免