Titlebook: Essay on Marxian Economics; Joan Robinson Book 1966Latest edition Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1966 econ

malignant

書目名稱Essay on Marxian Economics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Essay on Marxian Economics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Essay on Marxian Economics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Essay on Marxian Economics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Essay on Marxian Economics被引頻次




書目名稱Essay on Marxian Economics被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Essay on Marxian Economics年度引用




書目名稱Essay on Marxian Economics年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Essay on Marxian Economics讀者反饋




書目名稱Essay on Marxian Economics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

高貴領(lǐng)導(dǎo)

Definitions, and rent,. is the excess of net product over wages. The difference between gross and net product is . (.), which consists of plant and raw materials. It is . in the sense that it adds no more to the value of output than it loses in the process of production, new value added being due to the labour-

存心

The Long-Period Theory of Employment,“Accumulate, accumulate ! That is Moses and the prophets.” . The capitalists are not particularly interested in enjoying luxurious expenditure; . they are interested in acquiring more capital, and each is forced by the competitive struggle to enlarge his capital so as to take advantage of new techni

Overthrow

The Falling Rate of Profit, Marx accepted this view and set himself to account for the phenomenon of falling profits. His explanation does not turn upon the difficulty of realising surplus value — the problem, as we now say, of a deficiency of effective demand — but is intended to be valid even when that problem does not aris

ACE-inhibitor

注意

The Orthodox Theory of Profit,y necessary costs of production, and rent, interest and profit are all subdivisions of surplus. In the orthodox system, rent of land is a surplus, because land is a “free gift of nature”, and would exist just as much if no payment were made for it, but interest and profits are the necessary supply p

揉雜

是他笨

Adulterate

Dynamic Analysis,, and the impression which it gives of the present state of economic knowledge is not encouraging. It has generally been the fate of economic theory to run a losing race against the course of history, and never to have completed the analysis of one phase of economic development before another takes

OCTO

http://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/154972.jpg