找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: An American Dilemma; International Law, C Mary Welek Atwell Book 2015 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2015 conflict.f

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 41267|回復(fù): 42
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:55:38 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
期刊全稱An American Dilemma
期刊簡(jiǎn)稱International Law, C
影響因子2023Mary Welek Atwell
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/155/154817/154817.mp4
圖書封面Titlebook: An American Dilemma; International Law, C Mary Welek Atwell Book 2015 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2015 conflict.f
影響因子An American Dilemma examines the issue of capital punishment in the United States as it conflicts with the nation‘s obligations under the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. In a number of high profile cases, foreign nationals have been executed after being denied their rights under the Vienna Convention. The International Court of Justice has ruled against the United States, but individual states have chosen to defy international law. The Supreme Court has not resolved the question of legal remedies for such breaches.
Pindex Book 2015
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱An American Dilemma影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱An American Dilemma影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱An American Dilemma網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱An American Dilemma網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱An American Dilemma被引頻次




書目名稱An American Dilemma被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱An American Dilemma年度引用




書目名稱An American Dilemma年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱An American Dilemma讀者反饋




書目名稱An American Dilemma讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:00:00 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:01:43 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:08:08 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:54:34 | 只看該作者
Introduction,t is remarkable about Leal’s death—except that as he was a Mexican national, his execution drew attention and comment from the international community, from diplomats and senators, and from the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Leal was tried and sentenced to death without being inf
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:07:52 | 只看該作者
American Exceptionalism,inted out to the president, who, as Texas Governor, had a reputation for presiding over a record number of executions, that he should be aware that nations in the European Union viewed the United States as an international outlier. The practice of capital punishment, they warned, damaged the interna
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:47:16 | 只看該作者
The Legal Framework: Capital Punishment Law and the Rights of Foreign Nationals,onment. Those institutions, in turn, help to shape the environment. “Punishment,” Garland states, “is a social institution composed of interlinked processes of law-making, conviction, sentencing, and the administration of penalties. It involves discursive frameworks of authority and condemnation, ri
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:54:12 | 只看該作者
The Execution of a Foreign National: The Case of Angel Breard,y over the issue of the execution of foreign nationals. The failure of those involved in the American criminal justice system to inform noncitizens of their rights under the Vienna Convention first became a widely discussed and adjudicated issue in 1998 in the case of Paraguayan national, Angel Brea
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:50:35 | 只看該作者
The Execution of a Foreign National: The Case of Joseph Stanley Faulder,e developing in Texas and Arizona. Each litigation strained relations between the United States and a significant ally. The Faulder case in Texas centered on a Canadian citizen, while the LaGrand case in Arizona involved the capital sentences of two brothers who held German citizenship. Neither lega
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:04:15 | 只看該作者
The Execution of Two Foreign Nationals: The Case of Karl and Walter LaGrand,n nationality and sentenced them to death. Germany took the case of Karl and Walter LaGrand, specifically the denial of their rights under the Vienna Convention, to the ICJ. As Howard Schiffman notes, ., ., and . all highlight the conflict between US law and practice and the nation’s treaty obligati
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-10 07:40
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
克什克腾旗| 阿克苏市| 明星| 郯城县| 二连浩特市| 拉孜县| 新沂市| 江川县| 宣威市| 中宁县| 沐川县| 蕲春县| 连江县| 磐石市| 临猗县| 留坝县| 成武县| 文登市| 浦城县| 鄂伦春自治旗| 宝应县| 临猗县| 永安市| 宾川县| 永兴县| 嘉黎县| 建宁县| 民乐县| 平舆县| 合阳县| 肇州县| 达日县| 永嘉县| 吴忠市| 罗田县| 蒲城县| 江川县| 巫山县| 昂仁县| 和硕县| 泰安市|