找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: America in the Philippines, 1899-1902; The First Torture Sc Christopher J. Einolf Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature Americ

[復制鏈接]
樓主: 故障
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 22:13:58 | 只看該作者
,The Scandal Recedes, May–June 1902,rs of the Senate Committee on the Philippines, to a front-page scandal that inspired speeches on the floor of the full Senate. The debate continued throughout the month of May, repeating lines of argument from the previous month and adding a few new ones. These new arguments included an accountabili
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 03:57:36 | 只看該作者
The Effects of the Scandal,investigated and court-martialed in 1902 and 1903. Few officers’ careers suffered as a result, and most pro-imperialist politicians, including Roosevelt, won reelection. However, the scandal had a long-term effect on both American imperialist policy and the way the military carried out that policy.
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 06:25:20 | 只看該作者
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 10:23:49 | 只看該作者
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 16:00:41 | 只看該作者
Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2014
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 21:29:51 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08386-3 defines torture and provides an overview of its history; it then examines existing literature on its causes. It concludes with a discussion of the literature on the nature of human rights debate, both how advocates make charges of human rights abuses and how governments defend themselves.
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 22:33:21 | 只看該作者
Theories of Human Rights Abuses and Advocacy, defines torture and provides an overview of its history; it then examines existing literature on its causes. It concludes with a discussion of the literature on the nature of human rights debate, both how advocates make charges of human rights abuses and how governments defend themselves.
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 06:07:11 | 只看該作者
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 07:07:17 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08386-3 defines torture and provides an overview of its history; it then examines existing literature on its causes. It concludes with a discussion of the literature on the nature of human rights debate, both how advocates make charges of human rights abuses and how governments defend themselves.
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 11:33:34 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-16 21:36
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
响水县| 灵寿县| 株洲市| 垣曲县| 宝清县| 盐津县| 武陟县| 东阳市| 华蓥市| 阳谷县| 焉耆| 毕节市| 建湖县| 万盛区| 阜平县| 林周县| 满城县| 北票市| 南川市| 同心县| 大港区| 澄江县| 保亭| 禹州市| 德格县| 宁强县| 临潭县| 苗栗市| 乌兰察布市| 邢台市| 交口县| 呼伦贝尔市| 泉州市| 安义县| 响水县| 延边| 武川县| 山西省| 石景山区| 曲阳县| 邻水|