Titlebook: Ambivalence in Hardy; A Study of his Attit Shanta Dutta Book 2000 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2000 biogr

etiquette

,Hardy, his Wives, and his Literary Protégées,ariably their biographical sections that irritated Hardy. The worst offender seems to have been Ernest Brennecke’s . (1925) which is littered with Hardy’s marginal comments: ‘false’, ‘incorrect’, ‘untrue’, ‘conjectural’, ‘exaggerated’, ‘garbled’, ‘imaginary’, ‘impertinent invention’.. In a 1922 lett

衍生

匍匐前進(jìn)

,Conclusion: ‘A Confused Heap of Impressions’,n rapped out: “We shall have more difficulty in getting the vote than you men had: we have committed the crime of being born woman”.’. After centuries of injustice and blatant sex-discrimination, women in the second half of the nineteenth century were articulately demanding to be absolved from the ‘

填料

Bombast

有節(jié)制

Fazit und Wichtigste Handlungsempfehlungen,the first great tragic novel of his literary career, . (1878). In this novel Hardy explores, in reverse direction, the problem of deracination. If Ethelberta is ‘a(chǎn)n uprooted native of Wessex’ who seeks to escape from her native origins, Clym is the uprooted native who seeks to return. As a ‘thinly v

paragon

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14624-5arlier Hardyan motifs and holds in embryonic form the thematic concerns of the tragic novels to follow. In this underrated novel, we have: humanity pitted against the vast, impersonal and indifferent universe; an agonizing struggle between the life of passion and the life of intellect; human love an

BILIO

condescend

WAIL

Analysekonzept und methodisches Vorgehenariably their biographical sections that irritated Hardy. The worst offender seems to have been Ernest Brennecke’s . (1925) which is littered with Hardy’s marginal comments: ‘false’, ‘incorrect’, ‘untrue’, ‘conjectural’, ‘exaggerated’, ‘garbled’, ‘imaginary’, ‘impertinent invention’.. In a 1922 lett