Titlebook: Alternative Sets in Language Processing; How Focus Alternativ Nicole Gotzner Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017

膠狀

Contrastive Pitch Accents and Focus Particles,natives across different pitch accent types, contrastive and non-contrastive ones. [Experiment 5 appeared in the Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society (see Gotzner, Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the cognitive science society, pp.?2434–2440, Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX, 2

除草劑

Conclusions,levance of the findings for theoretical debates on focus alternatives and inference processing and show possible applications of the experimental paradigms used here. Subsequently, I discuss the relevance of the findings for research on language processing. Finally, I provide some general conclusion

細(xì)胞學(xué)

2946-2576 r shows that intonational focus and focus particles such as ‘only’ shape the representation of alternatives in a listener’s mind in a fundamental way. This book is relevant to researchers interested in semantics, pragmatics, language processing and memory.978-3-319-84979-9978-3-319-52761-1Series ISSN 2946-2576 Series E-ISSN 2946-2584

許可

CORE

Theoretical and Empirical Background,is shown that most previous work was devoted to focus effects on prominence, not taking into account the role of focus in evoking alternatives. Finally, a few previous studies are discussed which provide evidence that focus alters the representation of informational-structural alternatives.

充氣球

Book 2017e processing of alternatives. In a series of language comprehension experiments, the author shows that intonational focus and focus particles such as ‘only’ shape the representation of alternatives in a listener’s mind in a fundamental way. This book is relevant to researchers interested in semantics, pragmatics, language processing and memory.

Intersect

2946-2576 on long-standing issues in semantics and pragmatics.ProvidesThis book presents a novel experimental approach to investigating the mental representation of linguistic alternatives. Combining theoretical and psycholinguistic questions concerning the nature of alternative sets, it sheds new light on th

昏暗

卵石

Contrastive Pitch Accents and Focus Particles,pitch accenting and focus particles, affects the retrieval of alternatives. The results suggest that contrastive pitch accents help in identifying contextual alternatives while focus particles introduce an additional element of competition among members of the alternative set.

打算

Book 2017holinguistic questions concerning the nature of alternative sets, it sheds new light on the theory of focus and the cognitive mechanisms underlying the processing of alternatives. In a series of language comprehension experiments, the author shows that intonational focus and focus particles such as