找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Alternative Dispute Resolution in European Administrative Law; Dacian C. Dragos,Bogdana Neamtu Book 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 使入伍
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 13:43:23 | 只看該作者
Administrative Remedies in Polish Administrative Lawadministrative appeals remain the main tool for dispute resolution outside administrative courts. The figures gathered for this chapter show a reasonable rate of success for appeals against decisions issued by local governments, while a smaller rate of success is noticeable for central government un
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 15:23:18 | 只看該作者
Effective Conflict Resolution in Administrative Proceedings in Slovenia: A Theoretical and Empiricalysis, the effectiveness of legal remedies system is undeniable. Individual administrative acts can be challenged by a mandatory administrative appeal or further action before the Administrative Court. Simultaneously, parties can search for the ombudsman’s help to act as a mediator between them and a
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 21:20:04 | 只看該作者
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 00:30:00 | 只看該作者
The Dynamic of Administrative Appeals and Other ADR Tools in Romaniacourts while still securing a fair access to justice. While the importance of administrative appeals is widely stressed in theoretical studies, there are very few studies that try to discuss this issue based on empirical evidence. The chapter strived to offer both a comprehensive theoretical perspec
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 05:15:30 | 只看該作者
Serbia as a Part of the European Administrative Space: ADR Tools Applied to Administrative Lawucing court workload, and second, they are not of equal importance. While administrative appeal is comprehensively regulated and highly efficient in said regard, the Ombudsman found its place in the overall system of protection of the rights and interests of private parties in their relations with t
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 10:23:30 | 只看該作者
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 13:16:31 | 只看該作者
K. Junghanns,D. Bokelmann,H. U. Drünerds overrule a large number of decisions. As regards ADR, no general framework has been introduced, but the existing legal framework does not preclude ADR techniques to be introduced in the administration. The chapter analyzes two situations where ADR has been introduced and calls for a thorough debate before such measures are introduced.
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 17:57:51 | 只看該作者
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 22:23:30 | 只看該作者
O. Lundskog,H. A. Baar,J. Ahlgrenible in cases involving at least two parties and requiring dispute solving and balancing of conflicting interests of the parties (e.g., in building permit cases) as long as they are not prohibited by law.
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 23:46:56 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-8 17:10
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
石渠县| 嘉祥县| 长治市| 巴林右旗| 固安县| 寿光市| 崇信县| 江口县| 曲麻莱县| 陇南市| 新津县| 临武县| 诏安县| 开江县| 子长县| 柳江县| 莱芜市| 菏泽市| 衢州市| 安达市| 新营市| 平江县| 平阳县| 白水县| 嘉善县| 浦北县| 稷山县| 廊坊市| 麻城市| 乌什县| 连城县| 东乡族自治县| 抚松县| 柯坪县| 土默特右旗| 崇州市| 阿坝县| 鸡泽县| 辽源市| 天祝| 汾西县|