Titlebook: Algebraic Geometry; Proceedings of the C H. Kurke,J. H. M. Steenbrink Conference proceedings 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990 Autodesk

巨頭

http://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/152596.jpg

異教徒

Mixed Hodge structures on the intersection cohomology of links,y in a complex algebraic variety. The main result, whose proof uses the purity of the intersection complex in terms of mixed Hodge modules, is a generalization of the semipurity theorem obtained by Gabber in the .-adic case. An application is made to the local topology of complex varieties.

Odyssey

Effective bounds for semipositive sheaves and for the height of points on curves over complex functtain bounds for the height of points on curves of genus . ≥ 2 over complex function fields. Similar positivity theorems over higher dimensional basis and their applications to moduli spaces [13] were presented by the second author at the conference on algebraic geometry, Humboldt Universit?t zu Berlin, 1988.

irradicable

insurgent

correspondent

獨白

Decision and Game Theory for Securityn . ∈ ., die imagin?r-quadratische Zahlk?rper erzeugen (und damit Fixpunkte von Elementen aus Gl. (.) sind), algebraische Werte annimmt. Durch Zuordnung dieser Punkte mit .(.) = . zu Idealen in Ordnungen des imagin?r-quadratischen Zahlk?rpers . erhalten wir mit der ‘Klassengleichung’ eine algebraisc

defuse

Decision and Game Theory for Securityhese problems are related to hypothetical functorial and metrical versions of the Riemann-Roch-Hirzebruch theorem. One of the problems posed by Deligne is, for instance, the following construction:.Let a proper morphism of schemes . → . of relative dimension n and a polynomial P(..(..)) of absolute

AUGER

Michael P. Wellman,Achintya Prakashseveral decades (Kodaira: [K], Hirzebruch: [Hi]) that Г . is then an algebraic variety, and in fact of general type. The Hirzebruch proportionality theorem then tells us the (ratios of) Chern numbers of . Г ., which allows us to recover. from the Chern numbers of . if we know only that . is of the f

Anhydrous

John Ross Wallrabenstein,Chris Cliftonhen for all . ∈ . let me denote by .(.) the corresponding automorphism of . We have.where .(.), .(.)∈ End .(.) linear and .(.) the sum of terms of higher degrees. Let me recall the well known linearization problem: is the action . linearizable, i.e. conjugated to the linear action . (see e.g. [B] an