Titlebook: Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic; Douglas Patterson Book 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limite

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:16:12

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic影響因子(影響力)

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic被引頻次

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic被引頻次學(xué)科排名

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic年度引用

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic年度引用學(xué)科排名

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic讀者反饋

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:05:29

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:53:08

Logical Consequence,ing fact about the literature is that pretty much nobody has bothered to follow up the article’s many references to Carnap’s . in any detail—this despite the fact that the only conception of consequence Tarski mentions is Carnap’s. I will argue that the article intends nothing more than an improveme

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:47:43

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:36:51

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9247-6he older meaning-theoretic notions he had acquired from Kotarbiński and Le?niewski. Padoa’s method clearly should be construed in semantic terms, yet in 1934 Tarski is willing to re-use material from 1926 in which the notion of an interpretation of a term receives the same psychologistic treatment i

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:46:42

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9247-6ing fact about the literature is that pretty much nobody has bothered to follow up the article’s many references to Carnap’s . in any detail—this despite the fact that the only conception of consequence Tarski mentions is Carnap’s. I will argue that the article intends nothing more than an improveme

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:22:11

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:18:34

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:33:27

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230367227logic; philosophy; philosophy of language; semantics

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:27:36

978-1-349-30673-2Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2012

		自動(dòng)登錄	找回密碼
密碼			To register

關(guān)于派博傳思			派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站			友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹	公司地理位置	論文服務(wù)流程	影響因子官網(wǎng)	吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng)	大講堂	北京大學(xué)	Oxford Uni.	Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革	期刊點(diǎn)評(píng)	投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié)	SCIENCEGARD	IMPACTFACTOR	派博系數(shù)	清華大學(xué)	Yale Uni.	Stanford Uni.
\|Archiver\|手機(jī)版\|小黑屋\| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-16 15:55
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved