Titlebook: Alexander Zinoviev: An Introduction to His Work; Michael Kirkwood Book 1993 Michael Kirkwood 1993 communism.language.logical analysis.natu

護(hù)航艦

Zheltyi domedy that it has not been available to a Soviet readership. Were one to provide annotations revealing the subtext of this gigantic work, they would require many volumes. The translations which are available constitute varyingly successful attempts to produce equivalent texts at the linguistic level,

epicardium

Kommunizm kak real’nost’n various aspects of Soviet reality, which Zinoviev, however, presents as a theory of Communism as such, quite unperturbed by such questions as whether the Soviet Union is not better described as a system of ‘state capitalism’, whether the Soviet Union can truly be described as socialist, never mind

Opponent

Arrhythmia

Katastroikac). The work to some extent owes a debt to Saltykov-Shchedrin’s . (.), although characteristically Zinoviev goes out of his way to deny that . is a satire (K:29). A satire, however, it nonetheless is, and once again Zinoviev offers an insight into the workings of Soviet society via a description of

nutrients

Defraud

LANCE

Aids209

Eva Patel,Dharmender Singh Kushwahamind. An ardent individualist, he was always a conscientious member of his collective. His energy is phenomenal. In the course of his professional life he has written over two hundred books and articles on the logical structure of scientific language in an environment in which the non-scientific lan

痛打

B. Nithya,Aishwarya Nair,A. S. Sreelakshmisary preliminary to the examination of individual works in the chapters forming the remainder of this book. Zinoviev is a difficult writer in some respects and demands effort on the part of his readers. He himself has spoken of his work as ‘littérature synthétique’ (Zinoviev, 1990a:373), by which he

偏見(jiàn)

Ruhul Sarker,Hussein A. Abbass,Leon Youngotives for writing this huge book was the desire to ‘do something’ after the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia. Zinoviev regarded Poland and Czechoslovakia as two socialist countries who sought by various means to resist the crushing effects of Soviet domination, and the abrupt ending of the ‘Prague