Titlebook: Aid and Influence; The Case of Banglade Just Faaland Book 1981 Chr. Michelsen Institute, Bergen 1981 business.development.economics.industr

GOLF

書目名稱Aid and Influence影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Aid and Influence影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Aid and Influence網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Aid and Influence網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Aid and Influence被引頻次




書目名稱Aid and Influence被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Aid and Influence年度引用




書目名稱Aid and Influence年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Aid and Influence讀者反饋




書目名稱Aid and Influence讀者反饋學科排名

lacrimal-gland

苦澀

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45284-3ople were forced to leave their homes and move elsewhere in the country, or to India where ten million found refuge. Damage was extensive. The physical damage resulting from the war of liberation was estimated to have been well over $1500 million,. excluding loss of current output.

知識分子

Noisome

嫻熟

paleolithic

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45284-3or out of aid or Bangladesh’s own resources. Cotton and iron and steel products had traditionally been bought from the USA and non-ferrous minerals and paper and pulp from Canada and Sweden. It was hoped that these countries would wish to maintain their traditional trading ties and that other countr

GLADE

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45284-3ch as that of 1943. Over the years the situation has changed drastically. In the 1950s the population growth progressively outran that of rice production and in most years half a million tons or more of grain had to be imported to ward off starvation. In the 1960s imports were often in the neighbour

凹室

HALL

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45284-3played by India, the diversity of experience of Bangladesh’s own leaders and of the population at large, conditioned the positions taken by the Government of the new state and limited its room for manoeuvre. Pakistan was regarded with bitterness and it seemed unlikely that good relations could be qu