Titlebook: Agency, Freedom, and Moral Responsibility; Andrei Buckareff,Carlos Moya,Sergi Rosell Book 2015 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Autho

任命

預(yù)感

On the Luck Objection to LibertarianismLibertarians typically believe that we are morally responsible for the decisions (or choices) we make . those decisions are free, and our decisions are free . they are neither deterministically caused nor nomically necessitated by antecedent events. A well-known objection to their view is what we may call ‘The Randomness Objection’:

商品

把手

Marzanna Farnicka,Margarida Pocinhootivational states (Bekoff 1999) and responses to features of their external environments (Clock 2009). But unlike other animals, human agents are thought to possess capacities necessary for responsible agency that are not possessed, or at least not possessed to the same degree, by most other animal

critic

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230598003 You know that the corner store has a good selection of beers, so you walk to the store to get some. At the same time that you finish your meal, your cat finishes eating. Being in the habit of cleaning himself after eating, he looks for a comfortable place and gets to work cleaning his face. Both yo

LIEN

Kelly Kar Yue Chan,Chi Sum Garfield Laute. In fact, it has been argued that much of our difficulty in understanding how freedom and determinism may be compatible with each other arise from the assumption of controversial views about the nature of time. For instance, Hoefer (2001) argues that it is the ‘unholy marriage’ of determinism and

Gnrh670

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8375-6t common to all of them is the view that most adult human beings have, and sometimes exercise, free will and that free will and its exercise are incompatible with determinism. Therefore, libertarians consider indeterminism as a necessary condition of free will.

Intersect

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8375-6y for things beyond their control, and what seems to be our ordinary practice of judging people differently regarding what actually happens. This is a famous example (adapted from Nagel 1979). Two people, after having some after-work beers in a pub, decide to drive back home. On the way Driver A los

先行

Encounter with Canadian Schools,n of moral luck that has been overlooked in the literature, and that seems especially puzzling. It’s a form of luck illustrated by cases where our responsibility appears to depend exclusively on whether . are present and what their contributions are. In this paper I discuss this phenomenon, by appea

WAG