Titlebook: Agency, Freedom and Choice; Constanze Binder Book 2019 Springer Nature B.V. 2019 Agency.Agency Value of Freedom.Choice.Freedom Rankings.Ra

ATE

書目名稱Agency, Freedom and Choice影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Agency, Freedom and Choice影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Agency, Freedom and Choice網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Agency, Freedom and Choice網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Agency, Freedom and Choice被引頻次




書目名稱Agency, Freedom and Choice被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Agency, Freedom and Choice年度引用




書目名稱Agency, Freedom and Choice年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Agency, Freedom and Choice讀者反饋




書目名稱Agency, Freedom and Choice讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

去才蔑視

,Freedom’s Agency Value: What it is and why it matters,re it. I focus on the debate between proponents of a value-neutral approach to overall freedom (Carter, A Measure of Freedom, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999; van Hees, Legal Reductionsim and Freedom, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2000), and scholars who defend value-based approaches to overall freedom (

HATCH

關(guān)節(jié)炎

Plural Identities and Preference Formation,or a person’s deliberation about her values and goals before making decisions. Before addressing this question in greater detail in Chap. ., I pose the question how this picture of a person reflecting upon a plurality of motives, as widely employed in the philosophy of action, relates to the assumpt

翻布尋找

,Freedom Rankings and Freedom’s Agency Value,ured. I do so in a two step approach. In the first step I identify the formal and interpretational conditions under which a freedom ranking suffers the problem of desire dependency or the impossibility of paternalism. Given that the occurrence of these problems, as I have argued in Chap. ., indicate

Wordlist

違抗

流浪

0921-3384 -based approach to overall freedom based on problems usually.In this book, Binder shows that at the heart of the most prominent arguments in favour of value-neutral approaches to overall freedom lies the value freedom has for human agency and development. Far from leading to the adoption of a value-

匯總

chiropractor

Juliusz Piwowarski,Wojciech Czajkowskigained in this book can shed light on possible pitfalls related to the evaluation of well-being in a culturally diverse world, and to point to cases of high relevance in the evaluation of a person’s freedom across different societies and cultures which are not captured by existing contributions in the freedom ranking literature.