找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Age-Friendly Cities and Communities in International Comparison; Political Lessons, S Thibauld Moulaert,Suzanne Garon Book 2016 Springer In

[復制鏈接]
樓主: cherub
51#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 12:03:08 | 只看該作者
52#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 15:10:14 | 只看該作者
53#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 19:32:55 | 只看該作者
Happiness, Culture and Relations of Powerlity of each of the three levels of government to provide clear leadership, and to ensure that changes consistent with a whole-of-government, multi-sectorial partnership approach were progressed through a vision of the positive contribution of older people.
54#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 00:13:02 | 只看該作者
55#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 02:28:03 | 只看該作者
56#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 07:48:08 | 只看該作者
It’s About the People…: Seniors’ Perspectives on Age-Friendly Communitiesand capacity to age independently. Of greater interest, however, was the challenge of coping with various forms of “social press” including ageism. Participants disclosed problematic attitudes and behaviors of younger community residents that socially isolate, provoke anxiety, or result in physical stress or injury.
57#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 11:12:31 | 只看該作者
Whose Responsibility? Challenges to Creating an Age-Friendly Victoria in the Wider Australian Policylity of each of the three levels of government to provide clear leadership, and to ensure that changes consistent with a whole-of-government, multi-sectorial partnership approach were progressed through a vision of the positive contribution of older people.
58#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 16:02:40 | 只看該作者
Active and Healthy Ageing: Blended Models and Common Challenges in Supporting Age-Friendly Cities ansed in which the merits of both notions are integrated. By placing a well-considered vision on empowerment at the centre of the argument, the frequent criticism on active and healthy-ageing discourses being too centred on individual responsibilities can be overcome. Potentials of this perspective for AFCC are discussed.
59#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 21:32:44 | 只看該作者
60#
發(fā)表于 2025-4-1 01:03:30 | 只看該作者
A Critical Review of the WHO Age-Friendly Cities Methodology and Its Implementationies reflecting eight dimensions of the physical, social, and service environments. The checklist captured the characteristics that had been identified mainly by older persons in a focus group methodology known as the Vancouver Protocol. The Vancouver Protocol and the checklist have since then been u
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 20:02
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
应用必备| 麻江县| 昆明市| 郓城县| 佛坪县| 吕梁市| 中江县| 惠东县| 佛山市| 南昌县| 大邑县| 双柏县| 新邵县| 营口市| 河北省| 肥乡县| 黄大仙区| 达尔| 沅陵县| 保定市| 泸州市| 永清县| 福安市| 花莲市| 邵武市| 雅江县| 垣曲县| 东城区| 台东市| 建湖县| 海安县| 沭阳县| 蓝田县| 浮山县| 灌云县| 莱州市| 平湖市| 滁州市| 青海省| 罗江县| 古蔺县|