Titlebook: Against Equality; Readings on Economic William Letwin (Professor of Political Science) Textbook 1983Latest edition Macmillan Publishers Lim

毛細血管

Luisa Martín Rojo,Concepción Gómez Esteban the receipt of income; transfer taxation is seen as a mechanism for offsetting this presumed cumulative process. This chapter explores from several perspectives the egalitarian imperative that has dominated the literature on transfer taxation.

意外

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230514560Downsian’, is that in a democracy the poor are able to use their votes to obtain transfers from the rest of society (Anthony Downs [2, esp. pp. 198–201]). These two views are sometimes combined into the view that the bulk of the population takes money from the rich and gives it to the poor by use of the democratic process.

Foregery

Francis Halsall,Julia Jansen,Sinéad Murphym interested in is the possibility that there could be a substantive principle of equality — a principle which of itself could tell us how the particular members of a society should be treated: namely all should be treated equally.

committed

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03113-8s, Professor Atkinson describes the existing distribution as ‘unjust’, and says ‘there is a strong case for the introduction of reforms in Britain designed to bring about greater equality of wealth-holding’ (., p. xix).

Gullible

龍蝦

人類

incision

The stability of inequalityed remarkable stability, at least in the last 25 years. Figure 1 shows this almost unbelievable stability in the relative income shares. Figure 2 suggests a similar stability in the distribution of capital, though it is harder to get complete data on this; of course if we include human capital, the situation becomes much more complicated.

Anticoagulant

milligram