找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: African Foreign Policies in International Institutions; Jason Warner,Timothy M. Shaw Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Autho

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: LEVEE
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:49:42 | 只看該作者
Partnering for Peace: United Nations and African Union Cooperation in Peace and Securitye question of funding for African Union Peace Support Operations. Combining the strengths of the two organizations promises to greatly improve the effectiveness of the overall effort, and therefore ensuring that the partnership is a success is a golden opportunity for African states to advance peace and security on the continent.
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 16:18:44 | 只看該作者
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 20:26:28 | 只看該作者
Book 2018ring empirically based perspectives from a variety of scholars, this project disabuses the notion that Africa should be considered a "niche" interest in the field of foreign policy analysis. It asserts that the actions of the continent‘s states collectively serve as an important heuristic by which t
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 22:54:47 | 只看該作者
its in either the African Union or the RECs? Based on interviews with personnel working in and in proximity to the African Union between 2014 and 2015, this chapter argues that in general, states view the RECs to have more strategic utility than the AU, even though the latter has some strategic benefits that the former does not.
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 06:14:04 | 只看該作者
ntinual efforts to build domestic and international legitimacy. “Overall, we argue that ECCAS’s promotion of collective security” tends not to be so much a genuine expression of communal efforts at peacebuilding, but more of a reflection of its members’ domestic insecurity and their narrow regime interests.
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 10:24:57 | 只看該作者
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 12:20:18 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 17:47:31 | 只看該作者
Beyond the Collective: The Comparative Strategic Utility of the African Union and RECs in Individualits in either the African Union or the RECs? Based on interviews with personnel working in and in proximity to the African Union between 2014 and 2015, this chapter argues that in general, states view the RECs to have more strategic utility than the AU, even though the latter has some strategic benefits that the former does not.
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 21:38:42 | 只看該作者
The Uses (and Abuses) of the Economic Community of Central African States: The Hidden Functions of Rntinual efforts to build domestic and international legitimacy. “Overall, we argue that ECCAS’s promotion of collective security” tends not to be so much a genuine expression of communal efforts at peacebuilding, but more of a reflection of its members’ domestic insecurity and their narrow regime interests.
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 02:26:29 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 01:43
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
望城县| 沙洋县| 乌拉特前旗| 新巴尔虎左旗| 北碚区| 香河县| 肃北| 台北县| 南华县| 长春市| 林周县| 长宁区| 贡嘎县| 理塘县| 宁河县| 纳雍县| 德江县| 曲水县| 丽江市| 靖州| 炎陵县| 威信县| 册亨县| 天水市| 二连浩特市| 扶沟县| 浦北县| 水富县| 汝城县| 黎平县| 合山市| 呼玛县| 台中市| 巫山县| 中牟县| 曲麻莱县| 四川省| 巴东县| 曲周县| 华安县| 于田县|