找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: African Foreign Policies in International Institutions; Jason Warner,Timothy M. Shaw Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Autho

[復制鏈接]
樓主: LEVEE
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:49:42 | 只看該作者
Partnering for Peace: United Nations and African Union Cooperation in Peace and Securitye question of funding for African Union Peace Support Operations. Combining the strengths of the two organizations promises to greatly improve the effectiveness of the overall effort, and therefore ensuring that the partnership is a success is a golden opportunity for African states to advance peace and security on the continent.
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 16:18:44 | 只看該作者
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 20:26:28 | 只看該作者
Book 2018ring empirically based perspectives from a variety of scholars, this project disabuses the notion that Africa should be considered a "niche" interest in the field of foreign policy analysis. It asserts that the actions of the continent‘s states collectively serve as an important heuristic by which t
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 22:54:47 | 只看該作者
its in either the African Union or the RECs? Based on interviews with personnel working in and in proximity to the African Union between 2014 and 2015, this chapter argues that in general, states view the RECs to have more strategic utility than the AU, even though the latter has some strategic benefits that the former does not.
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 06:14:04 | 只看該作者
ntinual efforts to build domestic and international legitimacy. “Overall, we argue that ECCAS’s promotion of collective security” tends not to be so much a genuine expression of communal efforts at peacebuilding, but more of a reflection of its members’ domestic insecurity and their narrow regime interests.
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 10:24:57 | 只看該作者
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 12:20:18 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 17:47:31 | 只看該作者
Beyond the Collective: The Comparative Strategic Utility of the African Union and RECs in Individualits in either the African Union or the RECs? Based on interviews with personnel working in and in proximity to the African Union between 2014 and 2015, this chapter argues that in general, states view the RECs to have more strategic utility than the AU, even though the latter has some strategic benefits that the former does not.
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 21:38:42 | 只看該作者
The Uses (and Abuses) of the Economic Community of Central African States: The Hidden Functions of Rntinual efforts to build domestic and international legitimacy. “Overall, we argue that ECCAS’s promotion of collective security” tends not to be so much a genuine expression of communal efforts at peacebuilding, but more of a reflection of its members’ domestic insecurity and their narrow regime interests.
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 02:26:29 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 07:25
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
汝阳县| 广平县| 达日县| 西昌市| 瑞安市| 江陵县| 同德县| 江口县| 依安县| 仁布县| 怀化市| 台山市| 佳木斯市| 兴城市| 迁西县| 宜州市| 阿拉善左旗| 朔州市| 三穗县| 孟津县| 灵武市| 绍兴市| 玉门市| 淮南市| 响水县| 内江市| 静乐县| 阿拉尔市| 山东| 连江县| 巩留县| 溧水县| 罗江县| 库车县| 龙岩市| 巧家县| 侯马市| 安溪县| 太康县| 凤庆县| 黄大仙区|