Titlebook: Africa and the International Criminal Court; Gerhard Werle,Lovell Fernandez,Moritz Vormbaum Book 2014 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and Th

猛然一拉

實(shí)施生效

Africa and the International Criminal Court: A Prosecutor’s Perspectivele of African states within the system of the International Criminal Court and analyses the perception of an ‘African bias’ with which the Court is confronted. The author counters this perception by referring to the magnitude of human rights violations which were committed in Africa, the historical

AROMA

The Implementation of the Rome Statute in Africamethods by South Africa and Mauritius. In this context, the case of . that invoked claims of universal jurisdiction is dealt with in depth. In addition, the author depicts other forms of incorporation of international criminal law legislation in countries such as Kenya, Senegal and Uganda. Furthermo

合同

Domestic Prosecution of International Crimes: The Case of Rwanda all three judicial branches which were active in response to the Rwandan genocide—the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, the Rwandan domestic courts and the traditional Gacaca courts. With regard to each of these judicial instruments, the chapter gives an overview of its work and identifie

anticipate

The Extraordinary African Chambers: The Case of ,on and Senegal in 2012 in order to prosecute former Chadian President, ., and five other persons for allegedly being responsible for crimes against humanity, war crimes and torture. The chapter provides a detailed insight into both the substantive and the procedural law of these chambers. Moreover,

Irremediable

The Nigerian ‘Jos Crisis’ from the Perspective of International Criminal Lawrruptions) for many years. According to various human rights groups, despite a dramatic rise in the number of victims, not enough is being done by the Nigerian authorities to prosecute the offenders and to provide relief for the victims. As a consequence, the situation in Jos forms part of the preli

使長(zhǎng)胖

‘On Behalf of Africa’: Towards the Regionalization of Universal Jurisdiction?ticular to the prosecution of ‘African leaders’ before European courts which, in the view of the Union, could endanger international law, order and security. Against this background, the author examines the exercise of universal jurisdiction in Africa as well as in Europe over accused from Africa. W

催眠藥

Between Political Justice and Judicial Politics: Charting a Way Forward for the African Union and thspective. It provides an in-depth analysis of the deterioration of this relationship, but also depicts its prospects, assigning responsibility to all parties involved. The essential argument is that the African Union and the International Criminal Court have to reorient their positions. Potential fo

PLUMP

Africa, the United Nations Security Council and the International Criminal Court: The Question of De basis of Article 16 of the ICC Statute. It gives an overview of the events that have motivated the African Union’s dissatisfaction with the use of Article 16 and analyzes the content of the provision taking into account the drafting history and rationale. The chapter then looks at how Article 16 ha

提名

A Strained Relationship: Reflections on the African Union’s Stand Towards the International Criminalcution of incumbent African Heads of state before the Court. It analyzes how the African political elite, ordinary citizens and victims of crimes under international law view the International Criminal Court. In both cases Kenya is the main point of reference, because it has been in the center of th