Titlebook: Afghanistan and the Coloniality of Diplomacy; The British Legation Maximilian Drephal Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Autho

ARRAY

書目名稱Afghanistan and the Coloniality of Diplomacy影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Afghanistan and the Coloniality of Diplomacy影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Afghanistan and the Coloniality of Diplomacy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Afghanistan and the Coloniality of Diplomacy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Afghanistan and the Coloniality of Diplomacy被引頻次




書目名稱Afghanistan and the Coloniality of Diplomacy被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Afghanistan and the Coloniality of Diplomacy年度引用




書目名稱Afghanistan and the Coloniality of Diplomacy年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Afghanistan and the Coloniality of Diplomacy讀者反饋




書目名稱Afghanistan and the Coloniality of Diplomacy讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Pillory

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36934-6 state into a conduit of international relations after 1919. The period between 1919 and 1947 reframed the ‘Anglo-Afghan’ relations of the nineteenth century for the age of statal independence. The chapter establishes the book’s location in current historiographical thinking about space, such as emp

deriver

,Corruption in Early Modernity c. 1485–1688,olonial Indian governments in Rawalpindi, Mussoorie and Kabul between 1919 and 1921. In addition to a narrative starting point, it explores a wider history in the political relations existing between India and Afghanistan as well as between independence and empire. ‘The Remaking of Anglo-Afghan Rela

CONE

GULF

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230343344ls, it probes the extent of the Legation’s colonial genealogy in the networks of family and profession of Indian Political Service officers in Kabul. Considering also the career geographies of this supercolonial group, it shows the institution’s deep and wide-ranging connections with the colonial st

與野獸博斗者

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230343344olved, accreditation was a process of becoming. But, as with many other instances of gradation, the destination of that process was open-ended. In Kabul, appointed colonial officers took part in a diplomatic ritual that outwardly turned them into accredited diplomats in an international setting. And

CLIFF

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230343344iplomatic body from between the lines of diplomatic reporting and recording. Colonial officers introduced the Raj’s notions of physicality and racial difference into their relations with Afghan representatives and statesmen. Diplomats gendered and infantilised, bestialised and Orientalised Afghan bo

BIPED

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230343344ce and nature on the basis of colonial discourses of hygiene, security and ‘prestige’. The Legation’s architecture carried messages for those outside of the diplomatic compound as much as it sought conserve the existing social, political, cultural and economic realities of the imperial and colonial

Acetabulum

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230343344ted the Legation’s colonially inspired practices of othering through observation and reporting. The Foreign Office inherited the colonial tradition of Anglo-Afghan international relations as well as the epistemological frameworks in which it had been captured since 1747. The formal end of colonialis

謊言