Titlebook: Advocacy Coalitions and Democratizing Media Reforms in Latin America; Whose Voice Gets on Christof Mauersberger Book 2016 Springer Interna

情節(jié)劇

流動(dòng)才波動(dòng)

debble

Comparison and Generalization: Conditions for Media Democratization,network as a core organizational structure and (2) the use of communication rights as a central frame of reference, while (3) a potentially fragmented Private Coalition also makes media democratization more likely.

Integrate

muster

Pigeon

Democracy, Media, and Their Democratization in Latin America, about the “democratization of communication” in the context of Latin American mass media. Section 2.1 starts by laying out a normative theoretical foundation for the role of mass media in democratic society, based on Habermas’s concept of the public sphere. From there, the need for a regulatory app

叫喊

deciduous

Argentina: Radical Change Amid Sharp Political Conflict,o explain how the radical reform of media regulation, based on a communication rights perspective and passed in 2009, came about. Demands for a democratization of communication have been voiced in civil society since the return to democracy in 1983, but the first elected governments refrained from s

PAN

Brazil: Much Debate About No Reform,plain why there has been no democratizing media reform in Brazil so far. At first sight, reforms would have seemed likely for two reasons: first, there has been a broad advocacy coalition striving for democratization in the communication sector since the 1990s. Second, the left-wing PT, in power sin

修正案

Broadening the Scope: Advocacy Coalitions and Media Reforms in Chile and Uruguay,analysis of these two complementary cases cannot be as detailed as for the two main cases, but they nonetheless add considerably to our understanding of the possibility of media democratization. I will thus focus explicitly on the structure of the Coalitions for Democratization and their belief syst