Titlebook: Adversarial versus Inquisitorial Justice; Psychological Perspe Peter J. Koppen,Steven D. Penrod Book 2003 Springer Science+Business Media N

ALERT

Indebted

放縱

自愛(ài)

Children in Court,. However, when the evidence is eyewitness testimony of a child, complex psycho-legal issues are raised: issues of children’s comprehension, competence, accuracy, and emotional resilience, and issues of the legal system’s ability to adapt itself to the needs of children so that truth can be ascertained.

災(zāi)難

Adversarial versus Inquisitorial Justice978-1-4419-9196-6Series ISSN 0160-4422

integral

Control and Modeling of Complex Systemsevidence and interrogation of suspects. It first compares American doctrine regulating these investigative tools with the analogous rules predominant in Europe. It then discusses research on the way the American system works that sheds light on the relative advantages and disadvantages of the two regulatory regimes.

essential-fats

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64336-2. However, when the evidence is eyewitness testimony of a child, complex psycho-legal issues are raised: issues of children’s comprehension, competence, accuracy, and emotional resilience, and issues of the legal system’s ability to adapt itself to the needs of children so that truth can be ascertained.

不近人情

噴出

Decay Estimates for the Wave Equation,The observations contained in this chapter suggest that, when it comes to coping with scientific and other expert evidence, neither the Anglo-American adversary system nor the Civil Law system is quite up to the task. But they tend to fail in different ways, and that may provide clues to improving both.

公理