Titlebook: Adversarial Political Interviewing; Worldwide Perspectiv Ofer Feldman Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under excl

correspondent

Modelling Trace Element Transportiew itself to be a kairotic event. The interview was largely orderly, true to the Malaysian fashion of . (Malay for: to be cultured, civilised and polite). We view this study as novel; to the best of our knowledge, there is no available research at the time of this writing that employs the present s

Vertebra

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47199-0m the findings from previous literature and what is described as normative for political interviews, I found that some Montenegrin interviewers commonly used assertions functioning as rapport builders?and acknowledgements, and that they sometimes even supplemented their IE’s answers (e.g., collabora

辯論

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47199-0 presuppositions about their characters and past actions were false. The analysis builds on previous work by providing further evidence that political interviews have become more like conversation, and that while interviewers remain formally neutral, they smuggle in their own presuppositions. By exa

噱頭

Shanling Dong,Zheng-Guang Wu,Peng Shiical interviews and develop a method for interview analysis. The results show that in the television interviews the Finnish “Famous Five” performed both in the style customarily seen in Finnish politicians appearing on television and also in a way indicative of new nuances in politicians’ television

PSA-velocity

裂隙

Taxation and Environmental Innovationiewees depends on (1) the person who is being interviewed (and if he/she adopts or not a hostile or aggressive attitude), and (2) the professional affiliation of the interviewers (a panel formed entirely by journalists tend to be more adversarial, while interviewers with mixed backgrounds usually ta

頌揚本人

妨礙議事

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0841-9interviewee’s inconsistencies and vulnerability can make or break the presidential persona. Ultimately, the chapter attempts to shed light on how rhetorical strategies deployed in political interviews are mobilized to either reinforce populist visions or challenge them.

inventory

Book 2022orical?techniques?and strategies used by both interviewers and interviewees, from different disciplinary viewpoints including linguistic, political, cultural, sociological, and social–psychological. In doing so, the book develops a framework to assess the extent to which media political interviews a

暫時別動