Titlebook: Advancing Interdisciplinary Approaches to International Relations; Steve A. Yetiv,Patrick James Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) an

Roosevelt

書目名稱Advancing Interdisciplinary Approaches to International Relations影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Advancing Interdisciplinary Approaches to International Relations影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Advancing Interdisciplinary Approaches to International Relations網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Advancing Interdisciplinary Approaches to International Relations網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Advancing Interdisciplinary Approaches to International Relations被引頻次




書目名稱Advancing Interdisciplinary Approaches to International Relations被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Advancing Interdisciplinary Approaches to International Relations年度引用




書目名稱Advancing Interdisciplinary Approaches to International Relations年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Advancing Interdisciplinary Approaches to International Relations讀者反饋




書目名稱Advancing Interdisciplinary Approaches to International Relations讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

熄滅

Lucien Breems,Johan H. Huijsingnal conflict from a social science angle. He argues that the historical study of change is especially vital to understanding IR and conflict in both theory and practice. Building off this exploration, he sketches a conceptual framework that bridges foreign policy at the sub-systemic level with IR in

Goblet-Cells

Lucien Breems,Johan H. Huijsingvor hawkish decisions in conflict situations. By “hawkish,” they refer to a propensity for suspicion, hostility and aggression in the conduct of conflict, and for less cooperation and trust when the resolution of a conflict is on the agenda. While much extant work examines links between cognitive bi

軌道

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4818-0 trust, with possible implications for decision-making, and, in turn, conflict and cooperation. They offer a challenge to realist theory by questioning its assumptions about a fully Hobbesian world and by incorporating the notion of trust into our thinking and modeling as well. We are misled by the

馬賽克

都相信我的話

摻和

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4818-0 entirely different explanations of conflict than traditionally understood. They highlight especially the ways in which attention to women and men, femininities and masculinities, gender norms, and gender relations challenges given categories in International Relations such as levels of analysis, an

駕駛

Gene408

Signals and Communication Technologyctive on politics. It shows that economic development is a complex socioeconomic process involving multiple factors within a dynamic, nonlinear relationship. Their model synthesizes diverse ideas from politics, economics and demography and helps us understand problems such as income inequality and m

行為