Titlebook: Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2005; 11th International C Bimal Roy Conference proceedings 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Harding

書目名稱Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2005影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2005影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2005網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2005網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2005被引頻次




書目名稱Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2005被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2005年度引用




書目名稱Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2005年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2005讀者反饋




書目名稱Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2005讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

seroma

978-3-540-30684-9Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

ICLE

Lecture Notes in Computer Sciencehttp://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/147455.jpg

蓋他為秘密

Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2005978-3-540-32267-2Series ISSN 0302-9743 Series E-ISSN 1611-3349

GRIEF

ferment

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-79503-9problem in the standard model. This contradicts in nature well-known proofs standing in weakened proof methodologies, in particular proofs employing various formulations of the Forking Lemma in the random oracle Model. Our impossibility proofs apply to many discrete-log-based signatures like ElGamal

innate

Default

灌溉

,J’ai les réponses! Qui a les questions?,the sparseness and the ternary nature of the so-called double-base number system (DBNS). The speed-ups are the results of fewer point additions and improved formul? for point triplings and quadruplings in both even and odd characteristic. Our algorithms can be protected against simple and differenti

transient-pain

,Fabrique d’images et rituels de protection,ider evaluating an .-party randomized function and show that if . can be computed by a circuit of size ., then . is an upper bound for active security with optimal resilience . < ./2 and security parameter .. This improves on the communication complexity of previous protocols by a factor of at least