Titlebook: Acetabular Revision Surgery in Major Bone Defects; Eduardo García-Rey,Eduardo García-Cimbrelo Book 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 201

涂掉

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-548-0resses made in the field of hip surgery, the quality of the functional results, the increasing patient life span, the higher functional demand, and the enlargement of THA indications to younger patients and older patients as well. Consequently, the number of patients undergoing THA revision also inc

FEIGN

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7507-2g bone stock and will therefore recommend the use of the impaction grafting technique, taking care to strengthen the assembly of posterolateral defects with tantalum augments (hybrid technique)..An alternative to this technique for younger patients would be implantation a reinforcement ring with a s

companion

修飾語

Book 2019s-related problems and both types of complications are presented throughout the book. Surgeons with a special interest in hip reconstruction surgery will find this book to be an essential resource for ?successfully dealing with highly complex revision procedures.?.

NEG

不如樂死去

拋射物

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02322-8types of bone graft to use in reconstructing the acetabulum remains controversial as well. Despite these controversies, it appears that antiprotusio cages for acetabular revision are valuable in dealing with different acetabular deficiencies.

蜿蜒而流

afting.Presents challenges due to wear debris and osteolysis.This book reviews the most important issues related to acetabular revision hip surgery and assesses the different management procedures that are currently used in light of the challenging major defects. Since the 1970s there has been a con

babble

hematuria

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-548-0ased by 6.0% for primary total hip arthroplasty, and 10.8% for revision total hip arthroplasty. The number of THA will increase from 174% in 2030, and the number of THA revision will double in 2026. In the same way, Bozic et al. [4], reported an increase of THA revision by 23% between 2005 and 2010 in the US.