找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant; A Ciceronian Critiqu Catalina González Quintero Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Autho

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 35302|回復(fù): 42
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:05:39 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
期刊全稱Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant
期刊簡(jiǎn)稱A Ciceronian Critiqu
影響因子2023Catalina González Quintero
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/144/143592/143592.mp4
發(fā)行地址The first and only book to discuss the influence of academic skepticism on Kant.Only book dealing in depth with Hume’s relation to Academic skepticism.Develops in unprecedented ways the contemporary d
學(xué)科分類Synthese Library
圖書封面Titlebook: Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant; A Ciceronian Critiqu Catalina González Quintero Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Autho
影響因子.This book offers an unprecedented study of the influence of the skepticism of the New Platonic Academy on David Hume’s and Immanuel Kant’s critiques of metaphysics. By demonstrating how the skeptical teachings of the Academy affected these authors’ Enlightened attacks on traditional metaphysics, this book deepens and broadens the burgeoning scholarship on the role that the Ancients schools of skepticism played in the configuration of Modern skeptical outlooks. It bolsters the newfound recognition that we must reconsider the conventional view that the revival of Pyrrhonism in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries gave birth to Modern skepticism by incorporating the influence of Academic skepticism in the analysis..Giving a new impetus to this line of research, the author argues that Academic ideas and methods informed Hume’s and Kant’s critique of metaphysics in substantial and thus far unacknowledged ways. Specifically, she demonstrates the centrality of Academic skepticismto Hume’s epistemology and critique of religion through a detailed analysis of his theory of belief in the?.Treatise.?and the first?.Enquiry.?as well as of its?.application in the?.Dialogues concerning Natural
Pindex Book 2022
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書目名稱Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant被引頻次




書目名稱Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant年度引用




書目名稱Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant讀者反饋




書目名稱Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:08:35 | 只看該作者
The Skepticism of the New Academy: From , to Persuasion,espite this widespread formal recognition, the actual budgetary role of national legislatures apparently differs sharply across countries. Members of the US Congress ‘have long seen themselves as the bulwark against [executive] oppression’ and their ‘major weapon’ is the constitutional requirement f
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:01:21 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:18:18 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:48:27 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:11:09 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:50:58 | 只看該作者
,Kant’s Critical Solution to the Antinomies as an Academic Response to the , Objection,
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:55:11 | 只看該作者
Front Matterm compensation for personal injury; between the right to claim tort liability and the right to exercise property rights; and between the right to claim tort liability and the right to reject unjust enrichment. Further aspects in this section include compensation for death; mental damages; pure econo
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:07:00 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:31:05 | 只看該作者
Academic Skepticism and Metaphysics: On the Gods and the Immortal Soul,nts about NGOs’ freedom from scrutiny through formal accountability mechanisms, which other organizations are subject to, as well as skepticism about the alleged contributions that non-governmental actors truly make to the agenda of democratization of domestic and global institutions. Thus the issue
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-15 08:41
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
丰原市| 玉树县| 成安县| 徐水县| 万山特区| 卓尼县| 桑植县| 余江县| 玛沁县| 开远市| 龙胜| 当涂县| 平湖市| 义马市| 黄石市| 泸溪县| 茂名市| 宁远县| 普定县| 囊谦县| 巴彦县| 金华市| 晋中市| 绍兴市| 依安县| 栾城县| 兴化市| 交口县| 富阳市| 镇沅| 嘉义县| 蓝山县| 新巴尔虎左旗| 吐鲁番市| 晋城| 甘孜县| 长岛县| 平遥县| 新郑市| 枣强县| 玛多县|