找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy; Plínio Junqueira Smith,Sébastien Charles Book 2017 Springer Internation

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 38371|回復(fù): 59
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:37:09 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
期刊全稱Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy
影響因子2023Plínio Junqueira Smith,Sébastien Charles
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/144/143588/143588.mp4
發(fā)行地址Is the first to provide a general assessment of Academic Scepticism in Early Modern Philosophy.Is the first to be wholly devoted to this important but largely neglected issue.Brings together a group o
學(xué)科分類International Archives of the History of Ideas‘ Archives internationales d‘histoire des idées
圖書封面Titlebook: Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy;  Plínio Junqueira Smith,Sébastien Charles Book 2017 Springer Internation
影響因子This book explores how far some leading philosophers, from Montaigne to Hume, used Academic Scepticism to build their own brand of scepticism or took it as its main sceptical target. The book offers a detailed view of the main modern key figures, including Sanches, Charron, La Mothe Le Vayer, Bacon, Gassendi, Descartes, Malebranche, Pascal, Foucher, Huet, and Bayle. In addition, it provides a comprehensive assessment of the role of Academic Scepticism in Early Modern philosophy and a complete survey of the period. As a whole, the book offers a basis for a new, balanced assessment of the role played by scepticism in both its forms. Since Richard Popkin‘s works, there has been considerable interest in the role played by Pyrrhonian Scepticism in Early Modern Philosophy. Comparatively, Academic Scepticism was much neglected by scholars, despite some scattered important contributions. Furthermore, a general assessment of the presence of Academic Scepticism in Early Modern Philosophy is lacking. This book fills the void.
Pindex Book 2017
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy被引頻次




書目名稱Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy年度引用




書目名稱Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy讀者反饋




書目名稱Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:35:13 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:08:23 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45424-5Academic Scepticism; Disagreement and Academic Skepticism; Doubt and Belief; Empiricism and Certainty; F
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:37:00 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:46:01 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:33:15 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:50:07 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92762-2harron, il s’agit d’initier le disciple à une certaine manière de penser et d’agir fréquente dans l’Antiquité, mais qui serait peu à peu tombée dans l’oubli. La perspective pédagogique du traité et la critique qui y est faite des artifices de la culture étant essentielles à son interprétation, nous
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:41:10 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92762-2ère au concept de vraisemblable (ou probable). Le vraisemblable n’intervient pas spécifiquement dans le cadre d’une théorie sceptique de l’action, comme dans l’Académie sceptique, mais plut?t dans la pesée intellectuelle des arguments, et à des fins de neutralisation. Plus exactement, La Mothe Le Va
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:28:14 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92762-2s sources throughout his large .. It shall also analyze Bacon’s approach against the background of his intellectual milieu, looking particularly at Renaissance readings of scepticism as developed by Guillaume Salluste du Bartas, Pierre de la Primaudaye, Fulke Greville, and John Davies. It shall show
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:01:34 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-31 22:40
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
安义县| 龙里县| 丁青县| 务川| 富民县| 嵩明县| 广河县| 郸城县| 绥滨县| 团风县| 万盛区| 西安市| 灯塔市| 娄底市| 汉寿县| 凤冈县| 盐源县| 大关县| 东源县| 休宁县| 江源县| 青浦区| 凤城市| 波密县| 无为县| 梅河口市| 云和县| 伊金霍洛旗| 莱阳市| 南平市| 桦川县| 鄂州市| 伽师县| 枣庄市| 永宁县| 九台市| 洞头县| 东莞市| 武宣县| 蒲城县| 吴旗县|