Titlebook: A Republican Theory of Free Speech; Critical Civility Suzanne Whitten Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under excl

Aromatic

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2454-0peech in both public consciousness and political theory. Conflicts over the appropriate bounds of expression, from instances of hate speech and online abuse, to campus speech debates, ‘cancel culture’, and religious offence, all fall under the kind of civic exchange that is concerned more with indiv

MITE

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2454-0peech relations. This . obscures the way in which unjust social hierarchies limit the voices of certain individuals on account of their status within those hierarchies. In response to those who argue that such hierarchies are best combated by protecting the ‘free marketplace’ from interference, this

相符

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2454-0portant work .. As a response to the prevailing non-interference approach to free speech, Waldron clearly articulates the specific dignitary harm that hate speech causes to victims. While Waldron’s concept of assurance remains persuasive, his account does not go far enough in showing how less explic

助記

LATE

Luigia Romano,Sonia Fulciniti,Massimo Silvaecognition. I first discuss the influential works of three key recognition theorists: Charles Taylor, Axel Honneth, and Stephen Darwall, taking relevant features from each to construct my own analysis of the recognition struggles found in speech exchanges. In developing this claim further, I then pr

DEFER

參考書目

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2454-0idual responsibility than with state censorship. What is needed, then, is a new understanding of free speech, one which focuses on the responsibilities we as citizens have to engage in the to-and-fro of civic exchange while maintaining equal respect for all of society’s members.

assent

ticulates a republican theory of free speech, combining analThis book offers the first comprehensive philosophical examination of the free speech ‘battles’ of the last decade, arguing for a critical republican conception of civility as an explanatory and prescriptive solution.?Issues such as no-plat

Heterodoxy

即席演說