Titlebook: A Historical and Legal Comparison between Tianxia Wei Gong and Quod Omnes Tangit; Yifan Shang Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and

初學(xué)者

Andrzej Lingas,Mia Persson,Dzmitry SledneuThis chapter starts with the origin and the design process of the research question, discusses the definition of legal tradition and ends with the state of research.

相一致

消息靈通

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67899-9In concluding this book, this chapter reflects on the historical and legal comparison of the two maxims, points out the achievements and limitations of this study, and evaluates the two maxims against a historical background.

新星

流利圓滑

Diatribe

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95018-7al and political principles are important. Quod Omnes Tangit and Tianxia Wei Gong are such principles. The second methodological question is the possibility of studying legal and political ideas through history, in other words, if such research is possible or reliable, touching upon the concept of a

鞭子

Some Position Problems for?Graphse inner methodology, and the difference lies in the communication canal of these two maxims. Then comes the development process of the two maxims in history. This chapter examines whether both of the maxims experienced the process of from ius privatum to ius publicum, from ius naturale to ius positi

Conscientious

A Historical and Legal Comparison between Tianxia Wei Gong and Quod Omnes Tangit978-3-031-46467-6Series ISSN 1534-6781 Series E-ISSN 2214-9902

clarify

ALERT