| 期刊全稱 | A Comparison of the Bayesian and Frequentist Approaches to Estimation | | 影響因子2023 | Francisco J. Samaniego | | 視頻video | http://file.papertrans.cn/141/140299/140299.mp4 | | 發(fā)行地址 | An excellent introduction to Bayesian theory and methods, while taking an impartial view of their merits relative to the alternative "classical" or "frequentist" approach.A very readable presentation | | 學科分類 | Springer Series in Statistics | | 圖書封面 |  | | 影響因子 | The main theme of this monograph is “comparative statistical inference. ” While the topics covered have been carefully selected (they are, for example, restricted to pr- lems of statistical estimation), my aim is to provide ideas and examples which will assist a statistician, or a statistical practitioner, in comparing the performance one can expect from using either Bayesian or classical (aka, frequentist) solutions in - timation problems. Before investing the hours it will take to read this monograph, one might well want to know what sets it apart from other treatises on comparative inference. The two books that are closest to the present work are the well-known tomes by Barnett (1999) and Cox (2006). These books do indeed consider the c- ceptual and methodological differences between Bayesian and frequentist methods. What is largely absent from them, however, are answers to the question: “which - proach should one use in a given problem?” It is this latter issue that this monograph is intended to investigate. There are many books on Bayesian inference, including, for example, the widely used texts by Carlin and Louis (2008) and Gelman, Carlin, Stern and Rubin (2004). These books | | Pindex | Book 2010 |
The information of publication is updating
|
|