Titlebook: Wondering about the Impossible: On the Semantics of Counterpossibles; Maciej Send?ak Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Autho

legerdemain

書目名稱Wondering about the Impossible: On the Semantics of Counterpossibles影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Wondering about the Impossible: On the Semantics of Counterpossibles影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Wondering about the Impossible: On the Semantics of Counterpossibles網絡公開度




書目名稱Wondering about the Impossible: On the Semantics of Counterpossibles網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Wondering about the Impossible: On the Semantics of Counterpossibles被引頻次




書目名稱Wondering about the Impossible: On the Semantics of Counterpossibles被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Wondering about the Impossible: On the Semantics of Counterpossibles年度引用




書目名稱Wondering about the Impossible: On the Semantics of Counterpossibles年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Wondering about the Impossible: On the Semantics of Counterpossibles讀者反饋




書目名稱Wondering about the Impossible: On the Semantics of Counterpossibles讀者反饋學科排名

Esophagitis

Inferentialism,tional is grounded in the inference between the antecedent and the consequent. The main problem is establishing the nature of this inference. In the first section, I discuss the Nelson Goodman’s metalinguistic theory and the problem of cotenability (Sect. .). The second section is dedicated to a mor

SOB

大暴雨

Truthmaker Semantics,ct, inexact, and loose verifiers are explained both from a formal and informal point of view (Sect. .). The second subsection (Sect. .) is dedicated to an analysis of counterfactuals in terms of truthmaker semantics, along with the question of impossible states and so-called possible outcomes. This

curriculum

A Hybrid Approach,large part of this chapter may seem to be more about explanations than about counterfactuals (Sect. .). This, however, should shed some light on how one can think about subjunctive conditionals. The second sub-section (Sect. .) contains a proper presentation of DAC together with some consequences co

細頸瓶

Book 2024om the simple observation that wondering is an inherent aspect of our experience. Whether one regrets choosing a taxicab over the subway or contemplates the outcome of an election turning out differently, the question ‘What would have happened if...?‘ is a familiar one. While we often focus on possi

MARS

謊言

遣返回國

The Question of Counterpossibles,ed. The chapter closes with a general characterization of a variety of approaches to the analysis of conditionals and justifies narrowing the number of approaches that are included in this monograph (Sect. .).

Iniquitous

A Hybrid Approach,ne can think about subjunctive conditionals. The second sub-section (Sect. .) contains a proper presentation of DAC together with some consequences concerning the problem of counterfactuals. This includes a brief comparison between DAC and views that were discussed in previous chapters.